Submission to Parliamentary JSCT Inquiry into amendments to IHR (International Health Regulations) 2025 (P#24)

They do not consider the potential for turning the medical profession world-wide into a Nazi Dr Mengele style euthanasia/ eugenics operation. The medical profession clearly has that capability, which has resulted in much of the world’s population now being unnecessarily genetically modified by it.

The IHRs also do not mention the potential for psychological control of the world – as occurred by convincing the whole world to take a dangerous genetically modifying experimental vaccine/ poison. This was done through propagating the lie that it would protect the kids and grandma and so you didn’t deserve to live and would be discriminated against if you didn’t. The falsity of that claim has now been widely demonstrated and admitted by the manufacturers. If you are not aware of that, you have been following ideology rather than science and have been taken in by the mainstream media protecting its pharmaceutical advertising revenue base. You would need to push through your cognitive dissonance and seek out independent sources of truth on social media, which is now the only place where non-pharmaceutical industry funded research findings can be found. You could start by looking for the release of data by Barry Young last year in New Zealand. You might then ask why the data in Australia has been so manipulated, incentivised and so actively withheld.

Of course, we normally rely on medical ethics avoiding these catastrophic outcomes. But that clearly failed in the COVID-19 pandemic, when we also saw ethics, rights and freedoms swept aside and groupthink take over. This highlights the need for the usual, normal good risk management practice of considering both likelihood and consequence. It would require guarding against the terrible consequences of such possibility occurring, no matter how low the likelihood in normal circumstances, by requiring governance measures to be put in place to prevent it happening. These are very simple measures that can avoid great catastrophes and costs. This is stock-standard practice for the insurance industry, and it should also be for government and for organisations attempting to look like and function as governments, such as the UN and WHO.

A key risk is clearly medical leadership being commercially compromised or hijacked, as we saw in the pandemic. This is confirmed by Biden giving a pre-emptive pardo to Dr Fauci. This just so happens to dovetail with the WEF and UN desire to subvert, create crises and offer solutions that are to the liking of those controlling large corporate interests. This is the real danger of PPPs. What better way to do this than via the medical/ pharmaceutical industry emergency. In Australia, we’ve had peace for so long, we no longer think of or recognise subversion or suspect or recognise the possibility of betrayal by psychopathic people who have attained positions of power.

All-cause mortality did not rise during the pandemic until vaccines were rolled out, whereupon it rose alarmingly. Independent experts now estimate the number of deaths world-wide due to the C-19 vaccines at 20M, with many times more than that suffering debilitating injury. Given such disastrous consequences, putting measures in place to prevent this ever happening again should be at the top of our agenda.

But the IHRs do no such thing. They are totally blind to this. They are instead focused on how to stop people objecting the next time around and how to better force them into it! That is an indication of fanatical fundamentalism that is easiest explained by psychopathy and is reason enough to totally reject them. The risk of unintended consequence for Australia is just too high to even contemplate accepting them.

The IHRs need to be recognised for what they really are: a blatant power-grab by the UN and WHO to take over Australian (and the rest of the world’s) sovereignty by stealth while proclaiming it’s for our benefit. There are a number of things that give this nefarious intent away:

1. The National Interest Analysis is incorrect in saying the Amended IHRs were adopted unanimously at the 77th WHA – only 37 of 194 member nations supported it. The vote also violated Article 55(2).

2. There has not been any explanation or accountability for why Australia followed flawed WHO Guidelines during Covid-19 and ignored the Australian Health Management Plan for Pandemic Influenza (2019).

3. The process of getting to this point is at best dodgy and at worst, treasonous. Politicians agree to these things at the UN and then come back and sprinkle them across various bills after they have already committed to it! That bypasses the democratic process of vetting by elected representatives and parliaments, which they want to sideline anyway. It’s really illegal, but that’s nevertheless how it’s actually being done. It means politicians in power can play ‘gotcha’ on the population, gaslighting us that everything is hunkey-dory until it’s too late for anybody to do anything about it! This is not a legitimate way of developing treaties. Such approaches need to be rejected out of hand and put before parliament for genuine debate.

The USA has recognised the threat to its sovereignty and exited the WHO. Australia should do the same.

There are many other reasons to reject these IHRs and all Australia’s treaties with the WHO, including:

1. Australian politicians and agencies were not given 4 months to consider the finished wording of the IHRs and their implications for Australia, as required under international law to consider the finished wording of the IHRs and their implications for Australia.

2. The treaties will cost Australia billions of dollars annually and deliver negative benefit.

3. The treaties empower the Director of the WHO to declare a pandemic without evidence.

4. Emergency powers enable our politicians to follow the WHO’s lead and restrict Australians’ freedom by imposing lockdowns, travel restrictions, forced medical examination, mandatory vaccines, isolation and quarantine, as well as the completely unacceptable digital ID and unprecedented, unjustified, unnecessary and intrusive surveillance and store entry requirements.

5. The WHO’s approach to pandemic management in the Covid-19 epidemic was grossly flawed and it has learned nothing from that. It ignored low-cost, easy-access health solutions that had demonstrated their effectiveness in previous epidemics, such as increased Zinc, vitamins C and D and courses of Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. Patients were denied life-saving treatment and effectively sent away to die.

6. Implementing the WHO’s solutions to pandemic management in the Covid-19 epidemic created an economic and humanitarian crisis in Australia, costing around $935B or about 68 times the benefits delivered.

7. The WHO is neither an independent nor an impartial body, and thus is unfit to make decisions about Australia’s health policy.

8. The WHO is indemnified from liability for harm, meaning that Australian voters have no way of holding the WHO accountable. Furthermore, conflicts of interest mean the WHO is unlikely to strive for best-practice health outcomes.

9. These treaties have ongoing application and lengthy withdrawal periods, making them very difficult to get out of once we are committed.

10. The treaties establish a mechanism whereby we would be giving the WHO an alarming degree of undue influence over the Australian government and its people.

11. The medical profession hid the true scale of the disastrous and dangerous vaccine, and was unable to offer any effective explanation of vaccine injury symptoms. Doctors engaged in massive gaslighting of unfortunately damaged individuals. In spite of all the evidence now available, arrogance, lying it and backside protection by the medical profession continues to this day.

Stephen McGrath PhD