Flight tracker shows military targeting assets deployed around Geelong (#65)
We have recently seen how quickly other countries have been dropped into war, and we know that Australia is currently being urged into deeper participation in one. So, you would think that strategic questions of military defence of our own soil could be openly discussed – unless our armed services are already under external United Nations control (like our pandemic policy). In a real democracy, we’d also be able to ask (and get answers to) difficult questions about safeguarding the country against the possibility of subversion.
Leading up to and during war, any enemy will obviously strike at vulnerabilities. Our major physical vulnerabilities in the current crisis are the remaining two oil refineries. Then the Geelong Oil Refinery catches fire! Coincidence? Perhaps. The blaze has been officially attributed to an equipment malfunction causing a gas leak. But how would the general public ever know if whatever story put out to explain the cause was true or not? The plant is such an obvious target to anyone thinking militarily/ strategically, that the possibility of sabotage has to be at least considered and not prematurely dismissed.
Attempting to discredit consideration of sabotage by associating it with conspiracy theory would be so obviously subversive that it is perhaps unlikely. Any such subversion would need to be done via the media smothering any mention of any other possible cause, so the public didn’t find out about it. You would think we could have relied on our mainstream media’s investigative journalists to prevent that happening. But what if they were diverted elsewhere or constrained by ‘editorial policy’ (=censorship) or even induced or threatened or ideologically blinkered into turning a blind eye? These are obvious and possible means of subversion. Should our default risk management approach really be to ignore these possibilities?
This link shows flight tracker evidence that military aircraft used for surveillance and targeting were in the vicinity of Geelong around the time of the oil refinery fire. See https://youtu.be/_HiM4nC6cHM?si=UIdaL5zRecHW4S6D
We know that the militaries of the world have been investing heavily in DEWs (Directed Energy Weapons). These weapons have a significant advantage in that they don’t have to deal with gravity, as munitions firing physical projectiles do. They have great aim and fire accuracy. These things can start fires from anything they are mounted on – trucks, ships, planes or satellites. They need accurate targeting information that can be provided by drones and reconnaissance aircraft, of the type that were flying around Geelong at the time. Only militaries have access to DEWs and they can be fired remotely, with stealth. They can start fires without leaving any conventional evidence, albeit that the temperatures generated are much higher than forest fires, melting glass and metal.
My Posts #19 and #20 address the Air Force’s failure to protect the country from the chemical assault of spraying atmospheric pollutants and toxins all over us. So, would it not be prudent to adopt good management practice and presume that past record might be a good indicator of current and future performance? This flight tracker evidence would appear to be very difficult to deny with any honesty.
If public trust and confidence still matter at all, government needs to be open, honest and transparent about this. The population needs to be reassured via cogent, credible explanation and evidence that the country has not acceded to the will of an external enemy and provided the assets necessary to target our own civilian infrastructure.
Why were these Air Force assets deployed from Darwin to Geelong at that time? Where is our defence risk management planning for Australian population welfare at home? Were these assets commandeered into providing targeting assistance by external interests using some Trojan horse pretext (like the climate change argument used to smoke-screen spraying toxins in the air)?
Our new Defence Force commanders can surely step up and inform us on this. What possible need for secrecy can there be on operations conducted over our own territory when there is no visible, physical incursive force openly threatening?
Government silence on this matter can only confirm that it isn’t in charge of the things that really matter anymore and has itself succumbed to subversion. Trust in government, and in the institutions that are supposed to be protecting us, wears pretty thin in the absence of transparency.
**************************************************************
Subscribe for free to receive advice of new Governance without Coercion (GwC) posts.
Military tribunals are the only way we, that is the people of Oz are going to get accountability, justice for what they have been doing to us all, for years now.