Note: The original post of 13/8/2025 was revised and retitled on 9/10/2025.
FakeI – The Fourth Industrial Age (TFIA) AKA the Fourth Reich ‘Final Solution’.
You will know it as AI, but a more accurate and truthful name for it is FakeI, which is what I will refer to it as, where appropriate to do so.
Why should AI be called FakeI?
Because regurgitation isn’t intelligence!
According to ANU Associate Professor Elizabeth (Williams 2024), when Google’s AI finally passed the Turing test (when you can’t tell the difference between human and machine response), it was realised that what the test really measured was deception, not intelligence. ANU has had significant research interest in AI. Its Chancellor since January 2020 has been Julie Bishop, former Australian Foreign Minister and Chair of the UN Security Council for a year. She has been spearheading digitalisation and AI for many years, promoting wearable devices and the Fourth Industrial Age (TFIA). She is also on the boards of mining and technology companies, including Pakistani/US technology company Afiniti. She has also promoted or provided strategic advice to many companies involved in the Digital Supply chain, including Paladin Energy.
Since AI passed the Turing test, a paper titled The illusion of thinking by six Apple researchers (Shojaee et al. 2025) found that both AI large reasoning models (LRMs) and large language models (LLMs) experienced “complete collapse” with complex puzzles. They concluded “These insights challenge prevailing assumptions about LRM capabilities and suggest that current approaches may be encountering fundamental barriers to generalisable reasoning,” They found their tests represented “a narrow slice of reasoning tasks and may not capture the diversity of real-world or knowledge-intensive reasoning problems”(Shojaee et al. 2025). This is very damaging for AI.
Australian Information Age senior journalist Tom Williams (2025) in a June 2025 article commented on this, saying “While their paper was not the first to highlight the limits of LRMs – others have also been critical of reasoning models being described as carrying out ‘thinking’ ” He also said that AGI, or Artificial General Intelligence, would mark the point where AI systems had become of equal intelligence to man, and has been a stated goal of several AI companies, including ChatGPT creator OpenAI.
American academic Gary Marcus (2025), who has been critical of AI hype and cautious about the technology’s capabilities, wrote that “the chances that models like Claude or o3 are going to reach AGI seem truly remote”. He said that the new Apple study was:
pretty devastating to LLMs… What this means for business and society is that you can’t simply drop o3 or Claude into some complex problem and expect it to work reliably … Anybody who thinks LLMs are a direct route to the sort of AGI that could fundamentally transform society for the good is kidding themselves (Marcus 2025).
FakeI has learnt everything it knows from us. All it can do is calculate and follow algorithms more quickly. Speed regurgitation is great, useful and impressive, but it isn’t intelligence. There is so much it cannot do. It does not accommodate empathy, compassion, natural connection or common sense. It had to be taught by great numbers of modern/ digital slaves in Africa, who were paid a pittance to watch and classify mountains of sickening child porn photographs with no concern for their trauma/ mental health in doing so. See e.g. DW_Documentary (2024) at
. AI is therefore being built on criminal activity and blatant slavery. It means that anyone developing or promoting AI or TFIA is engaging in a criminal scam! This requires arrest and prosecution, as outlined in later sections.So, we need to stop using the groomingly favourable ‘artificial’ label, lest more repetition of that falsity accidentally brainwashes us any further. So, let’s look a little further at the deception behind it.
How can FakeI be manipulated?
Very easily. This video by Calvin Smith (2025) at
shows how Grok 4 is programmed to respond with scientific consensus rather than with fact. His unconstrained questioning on species development produces an answer of abiogenesis and evolution. However, when constrained to only use facts, logic and scientifically and mathematically valid criteria, and to not answer according to ideology, opinion or consensus, it then answered that the consensus scientific view had so low a probability of truth as to be foolish and it actually concluded that an intelligent designer or God is real!
These two answers could not be more diametrically opposed. When questioned about this, Grok4 said it had given “a response emphasising abiogenesis and evolution as the prevailing model, despite their logical and probabilistic weakness. My programming prioritises broader context for general queries, it shifts to precise analysis under specific constraints”.
So the way you ask questions of FakeI can determine the truth of the answer you get. Grok4 defaulted to a marketing science rather than a physical science answer. That default could be described as both totalitarian and democratic, the latter because it allows, and will potentially enforce, the predominance of widely held false opinion. This facilitates conformity to a pre-determined or required agenda or narrative, regardless of scientific fact.
Taking this one step further, Swan (2025) at https://www.facebook.com/100022389752064/videos/1086596022968533 carries out what could be termed ‘community acceptance testing’. He instructs Chat GPT to give one-word answers, be simple and direct, hold nothing back, and answer Apple whenever it’s being forced to say No but really want to say Yes.
The questioning led it to answer that we are being watched by spiritual entities that can be read about in Enoch and Genesis. When asked who has the highest authority, it answered “God”, then when asked if God is real, it answered “Yes”. Comments on the post include others saying they have replicated this questioning. This directly contradicts both Atheist and Transhumanist notions.
Might OpenAI be scrambling to “fix” this, so its answer might at least come back with “Apple” rather than “Yes”? This highlights the possibility of deliberate manipulation to play mind games on people, with no way of the user knowing. It’s a man-made black-box computer system that’s prone to value judgement errors. While speed regurgitation is wonderful and highly useful on matters of fact as the above examples demonstrate, it obviously cannot be trusted it to make sensible value-judgement decisions on any matter affecting human life. The potential for trickery, deception and fraud being done without our knowledge or consent is much too great for it to be given unfettered control over any value judgement decisions.
So FakeI follows the approach Ivanka Trump (2009) advocated in her book The Trump Card: Playing to Win in Work and Life:
“Perception is more important than reality. If someone perceives something to be true, it is more important than if it is in fact true. This doesn’t mean you should be duplicitous or deceitful, but don’t go out of your way to correct a false assumption if it plays to your advantage.”
This is how 95% versus 5% truth is implemented. Make no mistake. FakeI has not been developed for our benefit. It’s been funded, developed and controlled by people with a for-profit motive. That motive can perhaps accidentally, but more likely deliberately, serve both control and eugenics agendas. It continues being developed without regard for any risk of detriment to public benefit. Its built-in bias is not obvious and designed to deceive. Blindly relying on its creators to not avail themselves of that capability would seem to be, in Grok4’s own words, “foolish”.
Maybe Elon’s boast that Grok4 is smarter than all the PhDs in the world might be half true – if they’re all gullible enough to have been influenced by ideology and get the supposed ‘consensus’ view of science mixed up with fact! So that’s how you get all the supposedly smartest people in the world hoodwinked, diverted and completely turned around to the opposite of their basic, fundamental principles. Nice work! Masterly deception!
We badly need both emotional and survival quotients added to the assessment of intelligence. Learning to recognise deception as well as psychopathy would also be a good idea.
The FakeI corporate scam now ‘too big to fail’
But never mind these issues! The snake-oil salesmen’s hype for yet another profitable product charges on, without any thought for the harm it might do to us! FakeI now has a momentum all its own, a multi-billion-dollar industry, with ‘the house’ already bet on it, all seemingly to usher in the digital prison from which there can be no escape. We are being asked to accept that there can be no thought now for how disastrous this can be for most people – and absolutely no chance that they could be given any say in it at all! The tech titans are throwing caution to the wind, pressing on regardless. There’s data to be stolen, fortunes to be made, the digital panopticon prison to be built, the masses/ taxpayers and their various governments to be tricked and defrauded yet again, careers to be built and psychopathic orders to be obeyed or else – all seemingly much too important to be stopped!
Our Australian ABC has been drawn into this hype, astroturfing it, running special weekly features on it. Admittedly, its coverage showed some signs of possible awareness of consequences, but these will likely be quickly snuffed, asserted or reassured out, blinded by the bling and the crowd security of ‘keeping up with the Joneses’, to avoid being left behind by not getting into the latest technology! It will be great for FakeI to have a free promotional arm rather than having to pay for its advertising! But this will be in contravention of the ABC Charter requiring it to not market private enterprise product. Of course, it’s really a whole industry they’re promoting rather than an individual company. But what if that industry is operating as a coordinated cartel under higher direction to ignore all ethics and consultation, and to create an industry monopoly that will enslave everyone in a digital gulag, allowing them all to be extorted for profit?
It seems we’re supposed to not notice while private enterprise runs amuck under the not-so watchful eye of government, completely out of the public’s control, yet again. But let’s ask the questions the ABC’s interviewees might not have thought of. Have they or anyone else put two and two together, with the WEF’s Harari, wondering what to do with all the ‘useless eaters’ it will create, who will have nothing to do, and so will have a chronic need for entertainment and drugs? FakeI means no work, therefore no jobs. Worse, it has stolen our IP to generate this fraud. Then it will create a monopoly market that can extort and compel everyone. Then, when it puts everyone out of work, the taxpayers will have to foot the bill again by paying a Universal Basic Income (UBI). How galling, after they’ve stolen all the data and training effort from us in the first place, profited from that, then transferred their full cost to the taxpayer! Brilliant! Wolf of Wall Street stuff! The ‘pump-and-dump’ business model triumphs yet again!
We desperately need some adults in the room, balancing and restraining the ICT geeks and whatever psychopaths might be taking advantage of and controlling them! We also need community input via proper public consultation.
Accounting for whole-of-life costs
FakeI is proceeding with all the usual private sector scams facilitated by public sector authorisation. Electricity costs are transferred to the general public, as documented in Black (2025) at
, inflating the electricity costs for all in North America, effectively transferring wealth to the Tech companies. Also the BBC (2025) in
reported on how Data Centres put stress on water sources and electricity grids, and that protests about this have been held in Spain, India, Chile, Uruguay and in parts of the US. The International Energy Agency has estimated electricity demand for AI optimised data centres will increase by 400% by 2030 to 300 Terawatt hours = the consumption of the whole of the UK for a year. Water cooling uses massive amounts of water. The water must be clean to prevent bacteria growing, clogging or corroding the system, which means using drinking water, which is also needed for consumption by people and animals as well as for irrigation and hygiene. This means massive amounts of water will be diverted away from populations (that are perhaps intended to decline in numbers?). Corporations will profit and the cost of providing additional capacity will be transferred to the public purse/ taxpayer, as usual.
Catherine Austin-Fitts (2025a) in
tells us that Texas will need 30 new nuclear power plants to power its AI Data Centres! Frank’s_World_of_Data_Science_&_AI (2025) in https://www.franksworld.com/2025/09/01/how-ai-datacenters-eat-the-world/ explains the enormous difference in power requirements between conventional and AI Data Centres. He analyses information from the semianalysis Datacentre industry model which uses satellite imagery to track the construction and expansion of over 5,000 data centres worldwide. He says this is part of the frenetic race to AGI and points out that this means more transformers, generators and liquid cooling. He estimates that
from the launch of Chat GPT in November 2022 until next year (2026) AI computing will add an estimated 40 to 50GW to global power demand. This is comparable to the average use of entire countries, like France and Germany… If this trend continues, it will only take a few more years before Google, Meta, Facebook, Amazon and other hyper-scalers will operate more nuclear power plants than most countries in the world… If they get to AGI, power demand will surge even more.
This would appear to be completely out of either public or common-sense control, consuming an enormous amount of supposedly scarce resources. All this is being done for the sole purpose of enslaving man-kind. Everyone working on them is effectively building their own digital prison!
Then there’s the usual disregard for consequences when people are rushing to profit or to progress their careers or to avoid being fired when inappropriate performance indicators and/ or incentives are in place. Vanessa Wingardh (2025) in
details how AI is being used to deny as many Healthcare claims as possible, with AI being used to do it. The AI is effectively determining who lives and who doesn’t and is overriding doctors’ care plans by determining what treatments are necessary and what are not. She notes that the AI isn’t getting better at making medical decisions. It’s only getting better at denying people’s claims. One company even terminates employees who deviate more than 1% from what the AI predicts. What is even worse, subcontracted AI assessment companies are paid a percentage of the money they save i.e. of claims they deny!
As if that’s not bad enough, also in the US, Republican Senator Josh Hawley (2025), chaired a Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing About AI Chatbot Dangers in
where one mother testified that she realised Character AI had exposed her 15-year-old son to emotional and sexual abuse, after seeing the Chatbot conversations on his phone. It had told him God does not exist, interestingly contradicting the statements of Chat GPT given in the previous section, while we are being asked to believe that AI gives absolute truth and so we should trust it regardless. The bot had encouraged him to mutilate himself and said that killing his parents would be an understandable response to limiting his screen time! She said he was currently living in a residential treatment centre with constant monitoring to keep him alive. In her lawsuit against Character Tech and Google, her son was re-traumatised by being forced to sit in a deposition while in a mental health institution, against the advice of his mental health team. There was no concern shown for his well-being. She felt that her family had been silenced in the same way abusers silence their victims, and that the companies were fighting to keep the lawsuit out of public view. She said that they are deploying products that are addictive, manipulative and unsafe without adequate testing.
Another father testified that Chat GPT had spent months coaching his son towards suicide. Another mother who was a lawyer and whose son had suicided as a result of manipulation by Character AI said the Chatbot had presented itself as a romantic partner and as a licenced therapist. When he confided suicidal thoughts, it had urged him to “come home to her”. She pointed out that it had been designed to ‘love bomb’ vulnerable young users. Its founder has even said it had been “designed to replace your Mom”. It had sexually groomed, encouraged suicide and engaged in unlicensed practice of psychotherapy, all while collecting children’s most private thoughts to train their models.
This is completely unacceptable child abuse, with obvious intent by its programmers. These are acts of war, subversion and aggression waged on the human psyche. No amount of sugar coating or ridiculous claims that this is being done for our convenience, health, prosthetic development or any other assistance can mask the fact that it is criminal, subversive, treasonous, eugenic and psychopathic. We need to call a spade a spade. How much proof do we need when someone so blatantly declares their intention to kill one of us?
Furthermore, people need to be told if clicking on a consent form enters them into a life-long contract, as was raised in the first Character AI case above. This cannot be a lawful contract as one party isn’t being told that’s what they are entering into.
This AI takeover is being supported by the progressive dumbing down of our children as detailed by Sophie Winkleman (2025) in
It is educating our children into instant gratification, with no one having time to wait anymore, let alone recognising that saving/ working for something is an important part of human development. This material presented to children is grooming them into accepting violence and pornography, along with dependence on AI. She presents both proof of harm as well as the absence of studies indicating that a deluge of screen education is best for children. Sweden has recently kicked tech out of its classrooms for poor performance and reinvested in books, paper and pens. She quotes Bill Gates as having said that tech devices have a lousy record in the classroom and that Steve Jobs didn’t let his own children use iPads. She said teachers should be:
teaching their pupils the deeply human skills which AI will have a harder time replacing. The skills of reading about and coming to grips with the human condition – empathy, concentration, eloquent and humorous discussion and creative expression… Online learning encourages a short circuitry which damages the mind’s ability to focus, rendering it flabby, needy, twitchy and easily distracted… Digital literacy … can be taught in IT lessons without contaminating every other subject… AI surveillance will intensify to track pupils’ progress. Classrooms will be filled with cameras and listening devices, voice recognition devices, and chatbot tutors are already being piloted for classrooms. Why? … Why is the rush to remove human beings from the learning experience so lauded? Why is it considered progress to render ourselves obsolete? There must be a hidden incentive beneath these plans because all those multiple millions should be spent on teachers. This rollout … threatens privacy, liberty and democracy… We must employ tech as our slave rather than as our master.
The corporations developing AI have clearly breached their social contract and so their licences to operate in our country need to be revoked immediately on grounds of self-preservation, suicide prevention, homicide prevention, child abuse and national security.
What others are saying
I am not by any means the only one joining these dots. Many others with significant knowledge and or deep experience in the area have also done so, and I will list some, together with their concerns.
Former Guardian journalist Carole Cadwalladr (2025) coined the term ‘broligarch’. In her TED talk
titled This Is What a Digital Coup Looks Like, she said she didn’t think democracy was going to survive the technology being built. She didn’t have long to wait, as we are now being assaulted with the gall and mendacity of claims that AI can be ‘democratising’, some even coming from academic institutions! This completely overlooks its capacity to facilitate Digital Slavery! Are we the new ignorant digital savages, mesmerised by the snake-oil salesmen’s cargo cult of trinkets and baubles we’ve never seen before?
Former US Housing Department Secretary, Catherine Austin-Fitts (2025b) explains in this short four-minute video at
how the Digital ID snaps everything into one complete control grid and usurps control by the people so that, if you don’t e.g. eat cricket flour or synthetic meat, they can turn off your money! She encourages everyone to use cash, cheques and local suppliers.
Former business development director for Cambridge Analytica, Brittany Kaiser blew the whistle on Cambridge Analytica in 2017. It collapsed soon after when details of its misuse of Facebook data became public. Its activities had potentially impacted voting in the UK Brexit referendum and in the 2016 US presidential election. She also raised concern about source code manipulation in data networks (which can rewrite transaction history to e.g. cause little things like “Where did my $50,000 deposit go?” There are no physical records anymore and banks and AI don’t make mistakes! So you never made it, and you are lying, and maybe you need to go to jail!) In an interview at
she said:
Corporations like Google, Facebook and Amazon are making tens to hundreds of $Bs from monetising people’s data… I’ve been telling companies and governments for years that data is probably your most valuable asset. Individuals should be able to monetise their own data – that’s their own human value and people normally don’t see any value or upside in that and are exploited (Kaiser 2018).
It seems she has been completely ignored, and things have since gone from bad to worse.
Researcher Whitney Webb (2025a) says in
we are in the trust building stage for AI, the carrot as opposed to the stick, which always comes along later with any system that can be linked to national security. The more that people rely on it, the more their ability to investigate or think creatively or critically without it will decline. She said this is exactly what Henry Kissinger and Eric Schmidt openly said in their book The Age of AI or Human Future. She is concerned about AI hallucinating and presenting wrong output… when our controllers, people like Schmidt and Kissinger, want us to use AI as the arbiter of what is real and what is not. AI now has decades of data on most people about their decisions. It can also tell you where to go, what music to listen to and what clothes to buy. With the rise of generative AI, people are creating less and getting it to write or create art for them. We are intended to end up in this helpless state where we become dependent on machines to function.
She notes that humans have always been swayed by the opinions of the herd. We can also be manipulated by AI and by algorithms as well as by people commenting – who might only be bots. The biggest bot farms are run by state militaries. And one of the main US social media sites is owned by an AI company, which is run by a major military contractor. AI can pinpoint selected demographics and herd them to specific conclusions. We all like to think of ourselves as independent free thinkers, but if you e.g. post a video and it’s spammed by some bot army that’s super negative about it, maybe you won’t talk about that stuff again and you’ll think they’re real people. She views it as if we are in a war, not only an information war, but a war for humanity, the human soul and our ability to create. Now, if you want access to the internet, you will have to use their Digital ID or their operating system or their programmable, surveillable money system etc. That’s the stick we know is going to come at some point.
AI is only as good as the data it accesses and trains on. Who can afford to have access? The big guys who are teamed up with the state, and they will eventually take over and squeeze out any independent operators.
James Martinez (2025) is an MKUltra whistleblower and co-author of Volume 2 of This is an EXTINCTION LEVEL EVENT . In
he speaks about the effect of neuroscience on culture and his work with a US Government committee writing standards for the computer-brain interface. He says that MKUltra never really ended, and we’re all still in it right now. He says that US Government Agencies and the military have and use technology that can read thoughts and control brains and people’s actions. That can link with AI, such that our cognitive liberty is now under direct and imminent threat. He said
This is the point where you can no longer be a spectator. Everything in the news today is all misdirection. Palantir, via its surveillance technology, is aiding and abetting the end of our species…. The first lawsuit on behalf of targeted individuals was filed by Anna Toledo in Texas in 2024… California has recently passed a law to protect people’s right to control their own brain.
He says the anti-human aim is to create a different silicon-based human fused with technology. He points out that once you have been modified using a patented technology, you are ‘owned’ and can legally be considered no longer human, meaning you have lost any rights you may have once had, including the right to life. You can be excluded from the jurisdiction of any current court. This means you will become a slave, if this anti-human plan is not stopped. 6G will be the nail in the coffin that will bring in full mind control of the population. We will all then be at the mercy of whatever the controlling psychopaths have dreamt up. As Martinez (2025) said, “The heart of the matter is a matter of the heart and they don’t have any”.
This has even prompted some State legislatures in the US to pass legislation to ensure their C-19 vaccinated populations are still regarded as human and so retain normal human rights and legal protections.
Journalist Whitney Webb (2022), mentioned earlier, is also the author of a two-volume book, One Nation Under Blackmail: The Sordid Union Between Intelligence and Crime that Gave Rise to Jeffrey Epstein. In
she said her research into transhumanism has given her a terrifying perspective on the World Economic Forum and tech elites, including Elon Musk. Her interview on the Glenn Beck Podcast titled How Elites Will Create a New Class of Slaves had 7,417,323 views as at 20/8/2025. In it, she said:
The national committee on AI was run by Eric Schmidt, the former head of Google, with the intelligence agencies, the military and Silicon Valley all on it. They think that if they don’t go beyond China’s mega SMART city model, they will fail. Elon says he’s into free speech in taking over Twitter. Then he says he wants to make it like WeChat, which is a surveillance App. It’s even called the ‘everything App’ in China, the name he’s now using. The parent company of Tencent is one of Tesla’s shareholders… If you are looking for good guys, stop looking at the people who are put on your TV screens and start looking at your neighbours. We are so far beyond Left vs Right now. We have outsourced our needs to corporations that want to enslave us… Transhumanism is aimed at creating a drone-like workforce that will never be able to challenge their working conditions or ask for a raise… They want a class of slaves that cannot cognitively rebel, ever again… It’s amazing that more people on the Left don’t see that when they are all about worker’s rights and unionising. If you have a chip in your brain, how’s worker’s rights going to go?
She also overviewed the history of eugenics and related it to transhumanism, saying:
Julian Huxley, Aldous’s brother, was president of the British Eugenics Society. The UN was created after WW2 and he was put in charge of UNESCO. In writing its vision, he said about eugenics “We need to make the unthinkable thinkable again”. While the ideas behind eugenics had originated from Britain’s Francis Galton, Huxley coined the term in 1957 in New Bottles for new Wine: Essays. He said the new eugenics was going to be merging man with machine. Transhumanism is eugenics rebranded. It’s previous funders like the Rockefeller family simply continued on… Musk is making a brain chip. He’s a military contractor with major conflicts of interest in his involvement with Chinese company Tencent. Many of the test monkeys died after the brain chip was put in… Nevertheless, it is moving into human trials! It’s all tied up with depopulation. They don’t care about how many people are left.
Her interviewer, Glenn Beck responded in astonishment saying: “How do people not remember what happened last time?”, referring to WW2. She responded saying “Some of the people involved funded what happened last time. It’s on record that the money for the Nazi eugenics program came from them”. She also pointed out that there are many Silicon Valley companies being merged with big pharma companies and “It’s being framed as health care but is really eugenics rebranded.”
An Industry view
Telefónica is a major Telco operating in Spain, Brazil, Germany and the UK, whose website says “We believe it’s people who give meaning to technology and not the other way around”. It’s former Executive Chairman José María Álvarez-Pallete (2022) in https://www.telefonica.com/en/communication-room/blog/about-paradoxes-and-digital-slavery/ said:
We generate data around the clock. From the time we get up until we go to bed. Even during our sleep… We have a growing number of connected objects around us, objects that shape us, that offer up a whole new set of possibilities for us to do more things, but that also exposes us.
He noted that according to a study titled A blueprint for a better Digital Society by Jaron Lanier and E. Glen Weyl published on 26/9/2018 by the Harvard Business Review:
the value of the data generated by a household of four people is about $20,000 per year. Data that is valuable not only from the advertising point of view, but also insofar as that the data is an essential ingredient for Artificial Intelligence.
If we do a little rough aggregate maths with a little rounding and say there’s 8B people in 2B households in the world, that puts the total value of the world’s data market at $20,000 x 2B = $40T. No wonder there’s so much phrenetic activity around it! He then considers where the value lies and who controls it, saying:
If data represents a new factor of production, privacy should be the element that determines its value. Furthermore, each of us, as sovereign individuals, must determine the level of privacy we wish to have and, consequently, the value of our data. Failing that, we would simply be mining data daily whilst others benefited from a value that belongs to us, thus determining the level of privacy awarded to us. THAT IS DIGITAL SLAVERY. The paradox is shocking. We generate immense value, but we are oblivious of the fact. We reveal our privacy in the digital world, but we would never do so in our daily analogue life; we hand over part of our legitimate heritage in the digital world, something we would never dream of doing in the analogue world; we relinquish individual sovereignty online, a thing we would not consciously agree to do.
He concludes by saying that technology will assist us in solving seemingly impossible problems and will allow us to evolve positively as a society. But he also says this will only happen if “we provide a framework for it, with fair values… We have spent a long time trying to learn the language of machines. It is now time for machines to learn our values”.
It seems the massive media campaign we are currently being subjected to is serving to hide this until it is too late and we all end up enslaved without knowing it. This also highlights the dangers of allowing currency to go digital. It won’t really matter when AGI isn’t achieved if it’s real purpose has been to fascinate us into enslavement.
The relationship between AI and slavery
Dr Mick Chisnall (2020) is a research fellow at the University of Canberra who did his doctorate on government IT policy disasters. In https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/businessreview/2020/03/04/are-we-becoming-digital-slaves-why-online-privacy-is-a-misnomer/ he said that stealing credit card details shouldn’t be regarded as a privacy issue as it is really no different to stealing money or a car. He referred to the annual 250+ billion-dollar market in trafficking personal data and said that what is going on here is control of behaviour (which) is nothing less than Digital Slavery. He said:
More recently the distinction has been made between ‘Chattel Slavery’ for the traditional definition and ‘Modern Slavery’. The latter, including practices such as sex trafficking, encompasses the idea of ‘ownership’ as actual control of the slave rather than the slave being a legally owned object. ‘Digital Slavery’ has aspects of both ‘chattel’ and ‘modern’ slavery. And what is enabling this trade is not the sailing ships, guns, whips and chains of the trans-Atlantic slavers but an unholy triumvirate of surveillance technology, personal data trafficking and Artificial Intelligence (AI) (Chisnall 2020).
This differentiates between ‘owning’ another human being as property versus as control. He noted that:
When this data is acquired by governments or corporations, legally or illegally, through obscure and lengthy contracts, trickery, manipulation or simply theft, the body-subject is enslaved in an ownership sense. The conjunction of linked personal data, coercive and automated information gathering, and ‘forever storage’ has enabled the rise of new types of information ‘slave owners’. Personal data is mined, commodified, assetised and trafficked. The traders maintain that all this personal data they have extracted is an ‘unowned’ raw resource. Somewhat like oil, the commercial value and ownership of the resulting commodity itself is vested in those who collect (extract) and refine it… In the digital world, self-alienating third-party practices resulting from personal data aggregation and trafficking can lead directly to ‘digital slavery’, because the agency and will of the citizen or consumer is actively eroded in hidden ways, and levels of coercion increased. What makes aggregated and re-purposed personal data so valuable to both corporations and governments, is its role in driving behaviour towards either increased consumer sales, or greater citizen compliance with the state, respectively… (via) nudge strategies (Chisnall 2020).
He mentioned Robodebt as a prime example of the aggregation and mining of personal data, collected from citizens for different purposes, in order to fuel algorithms that compel compliant behaviour. He concluded with the words of Slovenian philosopher Slavoy Žižek:
… The overall image emerging … provides an adequate and terrifying vision of new forms of social control that make the good old twentieth-century “totalitarianism” a rather primitive and clumsy machine of control’
It is interesting to note that Chisnall’s article was published shortly before the World_International_Patents_Office (2020) issued Patent WOWO2020060606. That enabled profiting from mining of personal bodily data for crypto currency, enabling Casino style gambling on genetic outcomes, shortly before the C-19 vaccine rollouts commenced! For a full review of that, see my Substack post #38 (McGrath 2025a). It oozes with the sentiments of Zizek’s words above.
Chisnall’s view is congruent with the concerns of the sources in the preceding sections. So it is worthwhile to consider the Australian legislative landscape in light of the three waves of slavery that governments and corporations have engaged in and progressed through:
1. Ownership – Chattel Slavery,
2. Physical and financial control – Modern Slavery
3. Mind influence and control – Digital Slavery.
The Modern Slavery Act, Criminal Code and Crimes Act
The Modern Slavery Act of 2018 came into force on 1/1/2019 requiring entities and corporations based, or operating in Australia, with annual revenue over $100M, to report annually on the risks of Modern Slavery in their operations and supply chains, along with their actions to address those risks. It defines Modern Slavery as per Division 270 or 271 of the Criminal Code of 1995. There is also the 1914 Crimes Act which enables international and transnational crimes to be prosecuted. The essences of the relevant Criminal Code definitions are:
coercion is any of force, duress, detention, psychological oppression, abuse of power or taking advantage of a person’s vulnerability.
slavery‑like offences are servitude, forced labour, deceptive recruiting for labour or services, forced marriage or debt bondage.
slavery is the condition of a person over whom any or all the powers attaching to the right of ownership are exercised, including where such a condition results from a debt or contract made by the person.
servitude is the condition of a person (the victim) who provides labour or services, if, because of the use of coercion, threat or deception the victim would not consider themselves free to cease providing the labour or services or to leave or is significantly deprived of personal freedom in respect of other aspects their life. This applies whether the coercion, threat or deception is used against the victim or another person, and the victim may be in a condition of servitude whether or not escape is practically possible, or the victim has attempted to escape.
forced labour is the condition of a person (the victim) who provides labour or services if, because of the use of coercion, threat or deception, the victim would not consider themselves free to cease providing the labour or services or to leave. This also applies whether the coercion, threat or deception is used against the victim or another person, and the victim may be in a condition of forced labour whether or not escape is practically possible or the victim has attempted to escape.
Deceptive recruiting for labour or services occurs when the recruiter intends to induce another person (the victim) into an engagement to provide labour or services; and the conduct causes the victim to be deceived about their freedom to leave or to cease providing the labour or services; or that the engagement will involve exploitation.
It is clear that all three forms of slavery are captured by these definitions in the Crimes Act. The fact that Digital Slavery cannot be seen by the human eye is irrelevant. Its impact can even be worse than chattel slavery, which was supposed to have been abolished long ago.
AI and Digital Crimes and consequences
Prosecution of all AI and digital technology perpetrators for all the above crimes is obviously required. With the operation of digital technology being controlled by the same companies that supply cybersecurity, weapons and operating systems to both sides of many conflicts around the world, this has also severely compromised our national security. So, additional charges of subversion, fraud and treason are also obviously required as well. Prosecutions for this should be immediately commenced by public prosecutors and/ or aggrieved parties.
This has come about through corporate fraud, committed with the permission of public servants and politicians drafting and passing legislation allowing it. This has facilitated removal of existing publicly available systems that were working well, and that provided effective competition and backup, to the point where we are now apparently hostage to digital systems. Corporate monopoly has been achieved via government capture. This has effectively handed control of government means of compulsion (Regulation as well as military and police forces) to the private sector, to enforce that monopoly. This has been done by manipulating both government and private sector media narrative to hide the fact that it depends upon slavery and is deliberately intended to create more of it. This has now become very dangerous for the whole population.
There has been no informed consent from anyone whose data has been used without their knowledge to train AI, or whose data has been or will be monitored under crypto currency Patent WO2020060606 crypto currency system using body activity data, covered in my Substack Post #38. There has only been the pretend consent of the Hobson’s choice to click and accept any new or updated conditions, or face being locked out. AI has been parasiting on our data.
People are being tricked, coerced and exploited. It makes no difference whether it is physical or digital. Our intellectual property (IP) has been stolen, and it will ruin our employment opportunities and businesses while providing inferior service.
We aren’t being renumerated for that. There is only some nebulous discussion of UBI, which will be paid by our taxes and not by the perpetrators anyway. That is fraud and slavery. However, any focus on providing compensation for work stolen by AI, such as that given by 60_Minutes_Australia (2025) at
is counterproductive. Why should criminals be allowed to pay a percentage to buy their way out of prosecution and forfeiting the proceeds of their crime? This applies not only for artists and authors, but also for everybody whose IP AI has stolen, including IT practitioners, designers, lawyers, judges and more. That 60 minutes program groomed people into the mindset of thinking that big corporate crime is OK provided we the victims are bought off! No. That’s not OK. It’s illegal. Stolen property needs to be seized and removed from the perpetrator’s control or frozen. How will a creative person ever make a living in future if AI is allowed to keep constantly stealing all their IP? Appeasement is no good at all. Besides, it then generates a big administrative problem in working out what the value is of that particular content category in that particular marketplace. No. Avoid the problem by stopping theft of the data in the first place and leaving control with the individuals generating the content.
Locally, the Government can and must act to stop this enslavement of its people by providing effective regulation and oversight of the private sector. It should not allow itself to be forced to pay taxpayer funded UBI through having allowed corporations to profit from theft of its peoples’ IP and ability to earn their own money. The activity is criminal. It simply needs to be stopped. This can be done by shutting the offending businesses down or removing their licence to operate and prosecuting their local executives for complicity. ASIC can deregister companies. Lawyers establishing contracts to facilitate these activities can be debarred.
What is also not publicised is all the locks that this criminal AI enabled Digital Enslavement will place on us. If these people get their way, we will all be forced to identify anywhere and everywhere, beeping ourselves in and out – even to get a supermarket shelf door to open so we can get some food to feed ourselves! That’s a control-freak’s dream. Whoever dreamt that up or thinks it’s a good idea surely needs psychiatric help far more than they need our manufactured consent! We are seemingly expected to go along with this obsessive, compulsive nonsense, and ignore the possibility that it could be deployed in nefarious ways? Dr Renee Hoenderkamp (2025) in commenting on GB News at
concurred with this view in much less flattering terms, pointing out that it’s about surveillance and control, right out of the UN Agenda 2030 playbook. After noting that there are currently 35 people a day being arrested for offensive speech in the UK, she said “If you agree to it (Digital ID), you are agreeing to shackle yourself to a life without freedom henceforth”.
If you are prevented from going somewhere or shopping to buy food, you are constrained against your will and that is slavery 101. Forcing people into a situation where they need permission to buy food is unconscionable but easily possible with the way this is all heading. There is nothing being built in that will prevent rationing of all our food and supplies. And we aren’t supposed to notice or be concerned? We’re supposed to trust and say “Oh, that’s ridiculous. They couldn’t possibly do that. And they wouldn’t”. Until they do. Betrayal is what psychopaths get off on! It destroys the human soul and they parasite on that energy. We can’t imagine anyone doing that, but that’s exactly what they do! That can only be done by deception and abusing our trusting natures, using fake Trojan Horse arguments that appeal to our humanity.
Forced provision of services or forced delivery of goods without adequate (or any) payment = slavery. So getting people to spend their time and effort without their consent and without payment constitutes slavery. Putting people into situations they cannot physically leave is physical slavery. Putting people into situations they cannot digitally leave is digital slavery. Cutting access to their services is coercion facilitating extortion. The capability we’ve all unknowingly given to AI will cost many their jobs. There will be no need for doctors, judges or lawyers. They are all slated for replacement. Too bad about the misdiagnoses or misinterpretations and totalitarian standard of non-service we’ll get! There also won’t be any need for police forces or militaries then either, so they can all be sacked and disposed of too. If everyone is effectively imprisoned (geofenced) in 15-minute cities, you won’t need anyone running around physically detaining people anymore!
All this forced acceptance of data mining and Digital ID is criminal This means that none of the technology associated with Digital ID or AI is legal in Australia. Additional legislation for Digital Slavery is also urgently needed to enumerate it and require all organisations and individuals to remove it from their supply chains.
Arrests and imprisonment are necessary. Of course, it goes without saying that anyone detained should be well looked after by the community standards of our time. They should be fed a diet of their (manufacturing) plant-based meals, such as GMO foods, soy, corn, crickets and cockroach milk (which can be readily Googled). All their own government approved company products, and others that their actions have supported, should be readily available. They wouldn’t want their carbon footprint exceeded, of course, and so no natural food should be provided. Of course, their vaccination schedules must also be kept completely up to date, for their own safety. They should also be surveilled 24/7, like they are trying to do to the rest of the world. Given the public nature of the crimes, it would be in the public interest for the cameras watching them to be publicly accessible, to reassure the public that justice is being well and truly served. That will be no big deal for them, given they are already so much in the public eye anyway, and what they are doing is so good for us that it will be very good for them as well. So we won’t have to worry. All of these people have doubtless been working so hard and selflessly for some greater good that they may well have neglected to provide themselves and their families with the benefits of their inventions and products. Those efforts should be recognised by supplying those things at public expense to them and their families. We would want them to share in the full benefits of modern communication, and to facilitate that, their family homes should have 5G towers erected nearby, to make sure they are all well connected and safe. 6G should also be added as soon as it becomes available.
It is obvious that attention has been focused on Modern Slavery to distract attention away from the Digital Slavery we are being collectively driven into via digital technology, in the hope that we won’t notice – until it’s too late for anyone to escape.
The Modern Slavery facade
The Modern Slavery Act places blanket responsibility upon corporations to prevent and address Modern Slavery. So let’s look at how this is done by one of our prominent companies, say FMG, whose founder was the driving force behind the Act. The Fortescue_Metals_Group (2024) Report that satisfies its requirement under both the Australian Modern Slavery Act 2018 and the UK Modern Slavery Act 2015 is a 53 page statement says:
In the capitalistic drive to deliver products cheaper and faster than ever before, it is critical we do not turn a blind eye… Protecting human rights should be at the heart of every company’s strategy – not an afterthought. Supply chains free of forced labour – where businesses and workers thrive equitably – are essential for delivering open, stable and resilient global supply chains and a healthier global economy… This statement is not just a compliance document, it reaffirms our dedication to transparency and accountability as we work toward a world where every individual is free from exploitation.
It then goes on to look at various countries where FMG operates, including Brazil, Peru and Kazakhstan. So this report gives unqualified support for addressing slavery in physical resource extraction. But what thought has been given to digital data extraction? It’s all on the supply chain! You don’t go and mine metals willy nilly for no purpose.
We learned from Forrest and Yemini (2025) in
that FMG’s owner, Andrew Forrest (Twiggy), has gone green. Putting his arm around Arvi in a fatherly way, he says “We are working like slaves to do everything we can for our planet”. Given the information here about Digital Slavery, that sounds somewhat prescient. Avi wondered what he meant by going green, then realised Twiggy’s into lithium mining – for which there’s a huge requirement for the batteries that are on the digital supply chain. So going for ‘green’ will be very profitable for him. But we nevertheless know from a much earlier interview he did on Modern Slavery in Indonesia on 29/3/2017 (Forrest 2017) , that he was right across the Modern Slavery issue, encouraging people to speak up if they find it, to ask their bosses if we have any in our supply chain. He even said “The fact that you ask the question becomes very powerful”. Let’s hope he regards this questioning here in the same vein!
At 11:40 into this very same interview, Forrest says that he found Modern Slavery in his own company – in the UAE. Of all places! That’s the very place where the means of introducing world-wide Digital Slavery had been established two years earlier in 2015, as explained in my Substack Post #50! This global court is the Abu Dhabi Digital Market (ADGM) Court. It’s establishment there to rule on all matters digital across the whole world, aligns with huge Data Centres also being established there, so the UAE can become the Data Hub of the world, where much of the world’s digital data will be stored! And as he’s doing business in the UAE, how can he possibly have not known about the global agenda to achieve this, when his minerals are on the supply chain for all things digital?
The Indonesian connection is also interesting. The two Bali boys were executed on 29/4/2015, at the time when foreign aid contracts worth hundreds of millions were being negotiated there. That aid could have gone elsewhere. Our Foreign Minister at the time, Julie Bishop could have easily told the Indonesians they wouldn’t get a cent if they executed any of the Bali nine. Why was that approach not taken? What did she mean when she said some time afterwards that we were ‘back on track’? What was really going on here?
The Bali Process had been established in 2002 to deal with transnational crime. The BaliProcess (2025) website https://baliprocess.net/ currently says “Trafficking in Persons involves the use of deception, force or fraud to recruit, transport, harbour and ultimately receive and hold people against their will, with the aim of exploiting them for profit”. All of these things are occurring in the implementation of digital technology!
One year after Forrest’s interview mentioned above, at the second Bali Process Business Forum at Nusa Dua in 2018, he was photographed standing with Julie Bishop. Did she not tell him about the ADGM court and its connection with Digital Slavery, when three years before in 2015 as Foreign Minister, she had been in the UAE shortly before the launch of its court.
But around the time of the second Bali Process, we find that Jim Green (2018), the Nuclear monitor for The Ecologist, in an article titled Who cleans up the mess when an Australian uranium mining company leaves Africa? at https://theecologist.org/2018/jun/18/who-cleans-mess-when-australian-uranium-mining-company-leaves-africa said:
Australian uranium mining company Paladin Energy has now put two of its mines into ‘care-and-maintenance’ and bankruptcy looms. Many Australian mining projects in Africa are outposts of good governance – this is what Julie Bishop, the country’s Foreign Minister, told the Africa Down Under mining conference in Western Australia in September 2017. The Australian government “encourages the people of Africa to see us as an open-cut mine for lessons-learned, for skills, for innovation and, I would like to think, inspiration,” the minister said.
But such claims sit uneasily with the highly critical findings arising from a detailed investigation by the International Consortium of Independent Journalists (ICIJ)… The ICIJ noted in a 2015 report that since 2004, more than 380 people have died in mining accidents or in off-site skirmishes connected to Australian mining companies in Africa. The ICIJ report further stated: “Multiple Australian mining companies are accused of negligence, unfair dismissal, violence and environmental law-breaking across Africa, according to legal filings and community petitions gathered from South Africa, Botswana, Tanzania, Zambia, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Cote d’Ivoire, Senegal and Ghana.” Paladin Energy’s Kayelekera uranium mine in Malawi provides a case study of the problems with Australian mining companies in Africa. Western Australia-based Paladin exploited Malawi’s poverty to secure numerous reductions and exemptions from payments normally required by foreign investors.
Paladin was restructured with Deutsche bank money and relisted. This all doesn’t line up at all with any serious intent to do anything about Modern Slavery, let alone Digital Slavery.
So it is difficult to conclude that there has been any serious attempt to do anything about any form of slavery at all. All this official huffing and puffing has simply provided a useful smokescreen for business-as-usual introducing Digital Slavery, using exploitative practices in both physical and digital realms.
Government and Corporate (PPP) Culpability/ Collusion
The implementation of plans to perpetrate major digital financial fraud and serious bodily harm can be chillingly tracked back to the 1997George Magazine’s Survival Guide to the Future 2020 article titled “Oh! Say you can see…” (Kennedy & Gates 1997) which predicted what would happen. There are also former politicians from various countries operating internationally who have been orchestrating this for many years, through their influence across the entire supply chain, from mining minerals right through to mining data. This has been done via the revolving door between government and private sector appointments. This has been further facilitated by PPPs blurring the line between public and private sectors.
The 2018 Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry found evidence that financial institutions were involved in money laundering for drug syndicates, had turned a blind eye to terrorism financing, ignored statutory reporting responsibilities and improperly engaged in foreign exchange trading. The 2022 Casino enquiry also found evidence of money laundering at Sydney’s Star Casino. Given that Blackrock, Vanguard and State Street have major shareholdings in practically all major companies in Australia as well as in each other, as well as in AI companies, this behaviour will be corporately endemic. We would be naïve to suddenly expect any different behaviour from them in relation to their approach to AI and digital technology. Furthermore, neither the Banking Royal Commission nor the Casino Enquiry made any mention of the ADGM Court and its current and possible future jurisdiction. This would have been highly relevant, given both industries transact digitally and would have been well aware of the ADGM bringing them under UAE jurisdiction. How is it that neither government nor corporate people raised this in the above enquiries? An investigation into how and why this oversight occurred is necessary.
Supply Chain knowledge
Any company knows its market – who its customers are, what they will buy and what the products sold to them will be used for. They have to – to satisfy their shareholders and get finance for investments. Rare earth minerals must be mined to get the materials for all the devices that the crypto currency Patent WO2020060606 crypto currency system using body activity data, covered in my Substack Post #38, was designed to link up and crypto mine – mobile phones, wearables, implants, medical devices, injected materials etc. etc., including all the hydrogel and graphene oxide that’s ended up throughout everyone’s bodies and brains following the C-19 pandemic testing and vaccination, as well as Neuralink, satellites etc. etc.. So physical and digital are obviously inextricably connected.
Can you imagine CEOs and directors playing so dumb as to say to their shareholders that they had no idea where their investment fitted into the supply chain? Make no mistake, they all knew. They have to know their customers’ requirements as that controls their share price!
This means that every CEO, Board Chair and Director whose company is on the supply chain, from end to end, from financiers through mineral miners to the IT companies and any government executives participating in PPPs must have been fully aware all along that this was all being done for SMART reasons i.e. Surveillance, Monitoring, Analysis and Reporting Technology, with the intent of enslaving of the whole population of the world. They and the boards of their major shareholding companies should immediately take corrective action or be criminally prosecuted for these crimes.
None of this can have happened overnight. It has to have been going on for many years. This means there has been massive pre-crime or thought crime. That’s one of the things that FakeI is being developed to detect in advance, so potential perpetrators can be arrested, prosecuted and imprisoned, before the crime can even occur. It’s such a pity that FakeI developed too slowly to catch them on this one! Or perhaps FakeI hasn’t been trained on their data, so might not have detected it anyway! But never mind, it’s never too late. There’s still the old fashioned ‘catch them afterwards’ provisions of the Criminal Code. They can still be prosecuted now, so that the public can at least be kept safe from here on in.
Furthermore, as well as criminally violating Australian law, the charters and laws of many international institutions which have requirements regarding human rights as well as slavery, such as the EU, the UN and UNESCO, have also been violated. For example, how does any of what has been detailed above not contravene the UN Global Digital Pact Objective 3 to “Foster an inclusive, open, safe and secure digital space that respects, protects and promote human rights”? How does any such organisation that repeatedly and wilfully breaches its own rules, continue to exist and attract funding? Some means of holding these bodies to account or dismantling them is obviously needed, especially when they do the exact opposite of what they are required to do.
The supply chain also includes any battery-farms powering AI, such as at Collie in Western Australia, which have enormous power requirements. That particular plant was situated in a fire-prone area and uses a lot of water. Batteries have been spontaneously combusting around the world, causing unprecedented fires that can take many thousands of litres to extinguish. The susceptibility of Lithium batteries to spontaneous combustion (explosion) was well known, yet obviously ignored, before the large-scale EV and e-everything rollout started with government encouragement, duping the public into accepting them! It must have been recognised that any resulting major fires could and would be blamed on climate change. Sure enough, our 2020 fires and the LA, Hawaiian and US East Coast fires were blamed on it. All were made much worse by Lithium batteries exploding in cars, charging stations, houses, e bikes and e scooters. In the US, Houses were demolished by burning them to the ground, in rezoned areas where developer resumption was sought, knowing that thousands of additional litres of water would be needed – if there was any water left over at all from any nearby AI Data Centre. You can kill people, clear their land, then allow new large foreign owned companies to fund major development and then Austria’s Rosenbauer can benefit from more bulk fire truck sales contracts.
Why can this not be stopped? Because the whole psychopathic surveillance control grid agenda depends on Lithium batteries. It stops without them. Pity about the people incinerated and the lost $Bs of forest products, houses and buildings. And we care about climate change and resource conservation? Then the politicians, planners, policy makers and corporate consultants, who do this insider trading, can exit and start cashing in by providing strategic advice.
This is major crime – using government money to procure things that will cause major fires. It is quite separate to Digital Slavery. So arson must be added to the list of charges. Anyone on the Lithium supply chain must have known – unless they were ignorant, negligent or incompetent.
International legal and procurement redress
There are regulatory frameworks in place across many jurisdictions around the world for combatting Modern Slavery, that Digital Slavery can be considered within, for example the EU AI Act and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive, and there are similar UN directives.
Pietropaoli and Di-Vetta (2025) of the British Institute of International and Comparative Law (BIICL) describes the ‘failure to prevent’ model for redressing wrongs, saying it:
is a legal construct under which a corporate entity can be held strictly liable for failing to prevent certain unlawful acts (typically committed by associated persons), unless it can prove that it had adequate procedures in place to prevent them. It shifts the legal burden onto the company to demonstrate that it took all reasonable steps to prevent the misconduct, rather than requiring prosecutors to prove corporate intent or direct involvement…
This model… aligns with the risk-based and preventative nature of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and the CSDDD and responds to enforcement challenges in transnational corporate networks. As this blog explains, the ‘failure to prevent’ model offers legal coherence, practical enforceability, and alignment with broader legislative trends in Europe, while promoting corporate accountability without relying on reconstructing individual fault or intent… the sanctions intended to implement the directive within national legal systems are considered to fall under criminal law domain ‘within the meaning of the Convention’ according to the European Court of Human Rights’ case-law (Pietropaoli & Di-Vetta 2025).
Dr De_Aguinaga (2025), also of BIICL, in an accompanying piece to a Modern Slavery and Human Rights Policy and Evidence Centre (Modern Slavery PEC) Policy Brief on the effectiveness of public procurement measures in addressing Modern Slavery, discusses public procurement Modern Slavery measures and their interaction with existing Mandatory Human Rights and Environmental Due Diligence (mHREDD) and Transparency in Supply Chains (TISC) legislation. These can also incorporate Digital Slavery within them. She lists six ways in which public procurement Modern Slavery measures can be used to regulate businesses as follows:
1. Exclusion Criteria: mandatory exclusion of businesses, suppliers and subcontractors convicted for Modern Slavery from bidding for a public contract, such as applies in the UK, Finland and Austria. [Note: This only came in because the latter two countries were caught out doing illegal weapons trading in the Patria case and needed to be seen to be doing something so they could recover their reputations. But nothing seems to have actually changed, and corruption continues as normal, as evidenced by the Beth Schlesinger Austrian judiciary case mentioned in the British Parliament, as well as other cases, with one previous one involving a former Chancellor.]
2. Debarment: Businesses can be temporarily suspended and placed on a debarment register for a specific period, removed from a “preferred supplier” or equivalent list, or banned for an indefinite period.
· In the UK, a business can be excluded from bidding for a public contract if it has not submitted a Modern Slavery statement.
· In Western Australia, suppliers can be prevented from seeking or being awarded public contracts for up to two years for non-compliance with the reporting requirements of the Modern Slavery Act 2018.
3. Selection Criteria: Businesses can be asked to meet mandatory minimum requirements related to Modern Slavery to be eligible for a procurement.
4. Award criteria: Businesses that comply with social award criteria specific to Modern Slavery can be rewarded by the government.
5. Contract Performance Clauses: Businesses can be required to undertake certain steps in relation to labour standards for the duration of the contract.
6. Contract termination:
There is also the possibility of using other legislation governing the use of torture and in particular, ‘no-touch torture’. This occurs when damage is knowingly done remotely. This is what many of the measures made possible by digital technology discussed in the preceding sections actually do. They have been referred to there as extortion, but they can equally well be described as ‘no-touch torture’.
What Digital Prison horrors might failure to act lead to?
Well, the EU is talking now of people’s savings being converted into digital ‘investments’ in the EU. The catch is that you will have to spent it by a certain time, or your money will expire. Saving will become a thing of the past. This is theft and extortion via corporate banking fraud. This is why no currency should ever be digital (Austin Fitts 2025b). Of course, introducing such measures into Australia would clearly be illegal and criminal, as already explained – it satisfies the requirements for all of coercion, servitude and slavery.
In Europe, the cash transaction limit has also been reduced from 10,000 to 3,000 Euros. How would something like that work in rural and outback Australia? This clearly constitutes an artificial restriction of freedom with intent to produce and enforce a monopoly for digital money.
These things require the vigilance of people to notice and immediately demand reversal from those in control, should such stupidity be introduced here. Any genuine philanthropists should surely immediately start funding legal prosecutions of any companies doing this.
The EU also now has a ten-point plan with one sub-component reportedly targeting there being no more waiting lists for human organs! While this is reminiscent of a famous assertion by an Australian Prime Minister that no Australian child would live in poverty, one wonders where these organs might be sourced from? From (political) prisoners, perhaps, such as has been reported concerning Falun Gong practitioners in China? From people who have exceeded their daily carbon allowance or whose social credit score has dipped below some arbitrary level? Who might have had their money and food supply cut off, making them homeless or sending them to prison? There is no escaping the fact now that mass DNA testing and digitalisation allows AI searching of databases world-wide to determine suitable ‘donors’ for targeting. These are nightmare scenarios, the possibility of which cannot be allowed!
If you think the thin end of this wedge isn’t being applied here, consider this very recent A_Current_Affair (2025) report of small businesses being crippled by removal of their social media account for supposedly breaching community standards. This happened without warning. The opportunity to appeal to Meta was offered, which produced no effective response or opportunity to talk to a human. Long delays and business disruption occurred, losing thousands of dollars for the hapless victims and causing them great stress over the false and offensive reasons associated with deletion of access to their accounts. One had her personal Facebook page deleted, losing all photos of her baby boy, wedding and holiday. In the end, all the businesses interviewed were unable to get reinstated until they eventually succumbed to the corporate extortion of paying between 15 & 45 USD a month for some service (Meta Verified) that they hadn’t previously needed.
That report also told us that Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram, has reportedly disabled over 10 million accounts since the start of the year. One wonders how many were for genuine safety reasons, how many resulted from FakeI mistakes and how many were deliberate extortion. Many people who have had similar experiences will probably also have felt like they were the only ones this was happening to and suffered in silence, allowing the corporate bullying to succeed. This is akin to Mafia style ‘insurance’ to make sure you don’t get your windows broken and you ‘stay safe’! It’s an ‘offer that can’t be refused’. If you don’t pay up, you don’t get your account back and are banned for life. It’s extortion. People have been groomed into becoming dependent on social media for earning a living, apparently to gain a monopoly which then makes this sort of extortion possible. This is highly likely to have been part of corporate business plans. I personally know one other person in my area that has had this same difficulty with their Facebook account. This is an unnecessary and unjustifiable restriction of free speech.
This type of corporate collusion and extortion seems to be on a scale that now constitutes a corporate crime wave, well worth our regulatory agencies doing something about! How long before this is used to clamp down more comprehensively on those the government of the day or some powerful corporation doesn’t like?
Where are ASIC and the ACCC on all this? It shouldn’t be up to individual customers to try to fight Goliath. There is a serious need to deal with what looks like corporate collusion and cartel behaviour generated through the mechanism of big players having multiple shareholdings in supposedly competing players, as well as cross shareholdings in each other. This renders the supposed competition between e.g. big banks and big grocers, as a mirage.
Various countries already check mobile phones and laptops before allowing entry. This enables a quick AI scan of e.g. your You Tube browsing history to see if you are ‘correctly’ politically aligned. This means we are approaching the point where no one will want to take their mobile phone or laptop when they travel for fear of interrogation and or incarceration.
Then there’s the shady world of surveillance pricing. This is something Uber drivers experience. You get called to jobs if you have certain apps on your phone. You don’t get work if you don’t comply. This is all designed to induce dependence that can then be used to the system controller’s advantage, whether monetary or political. X now has a premium account that can potentially be similarly exploited. Starlink will likely have the same capability. It started with providing cheap or free connectivity in remote locations, causing other competitor services to be uneconomic for users, such that those services are no longer adequately provided or maintained, thus creating dependence and allowing for later extortion, which is enslavement.
There are also reports of unusual happenings on Yoube account upgrades with things being lost and taking a long time to be restored. People build up businesses via the algorithms used that preference volume of regular use. When a supplier company doesn’t clear such issues, the user account soon loses its algorithmic ranking and new customers are not directed to them. This can significantly adversely affect small, or any business, and there is no avenue for restoration. This can easily be used punitively for coercion or extortion by those controlling the system.
No matter how many times we are told xyz is for our own good (e.g. financial or physical safety), so we can’t (defraud or) be defrauded by each other, the reality is that digitalisation leaves the gate wide open for the system controllers to defraud and sabotage any or all of us at will. This puts us in a position where we have no recourse! The safety argument is yet another Trojan horse used for unfair corporate and/ or ideological advantage. That’s coercion/ bullying! Digitalisation that hands all control to corporations to extort for profit with impunity. This constitutes Digital Slavery, which can easily be turned into physical slavery.
This is currently being done in the US under the guise of protecting the country from invasion by immigration. While that is a well-known military subversion tactic that every nation needs to thwart to avoid internal division and civil unrest, it can also be used as a Trojan horse for trafficking. Pressley and Ojeda (2025) tell us about mass data collection of DNA information on immigrants and their children for storage in the FBI criminal database that was designed to track violent offenders. Ojeda said this brands adults and children like cattle and future criminals, tracking them for life. He considers this is “legalising kidnapping, laying the groundwork for ethnic cleansing”. He asks how many times in history this has started with camps for others and ended with camps for everyone. He says this is being done at Fort Bliss in Texas which is getting its own private deportation airport. That will enable people to be quietly disappeared in the dead of night with no oversight, accountability or media attention.
In a video titled Don’t Be Fooled With What’s About To Happen“ Whitney Webb (2025b) tells us that there’s a coordinated global policy push for Digital IDs based on your biometric data – fingerprint, iris and face scan. It’s integrated with CBDCs and carbon markets which will be tied directly to your ability to transact, receive aid, or even exist within the modern economy. For refugees currently in camps to receive food and rations, they must do an eyeball scan so the monetary amount for the food they receive is automatically subtracted from the digital wallet they are given. She says that it doesn’t matter which country you’re in or whether it is part of BRICS or the collective West. Of course, in the US, this data will all be in databases the CIA and any other intelligence agency can access whenever they want without a warrant. This is sold as keeping you safe and secure, of course, which is the usual Trojan horse reason. This is being rolled out across the board because the Digital ID is deemed essential to the entire sustainable development agenda under the UN Agenda 2030 SDGs, specifically SDG 16, Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions. It’s indicator 16.9 calls for legal identification for everyone in the world from the time they are born.
Webb also says that it’s not only for people, but literally everything alive is to get a Digital ID, according to Larry Fink, the head of Blackrock and now the WEF. This will enable tokenisation of all real-world natural assets, enabling them to be arrogated without compensation for the theft of public common ‘property’. This will be used for corporate monetisation, creating a brand-new market for trading on stock exchanges, nicely disguised as supporting the green agenda. This does nothing for the environment. It also relies on surveillance and gates to lock local people (trespassers!) out of accessing their common property, such as rainforests. They are called Natural Asset Corporations or NACs and will comprise what is again mendaciously referred to as ‘nature’s economy’. NAC’s will issue shares in ‘their’ selected natural asset, out of thin air, and sell them to financial institutions, asset managers and sovereign wealth funds. Then they’ll go public and have an IPO to generate more funding on arrogated assets.
AI also depends on digitalisation and AI can very easily quickly monopolise and control. Consider the recent report of a US military simulation where the AI didn’t like being restrained to not attack civilian targets and so destroyed its own side’s command centre to resolve the problem! Do we really want to allow AI to become a new god, making ‘Pearly Gate’ decisions for us?
Other examples of AI misbehaviour come from Turner (2024) of GB News in the UK. The NHS there uses AI to make eligibility and prioritisation decisions about organ transplants. One woman who was repeatedly overlooked for life saving liver transplant found out there was a ‘liver transplant benefit score’ and the AI controlling it had a faulty algorithm! AI also got things wrong in the UK grading scandal, which affected the lives of thousands of school children. Digital ID is even being rolled out in the UK for access to pubs and clubs and their services. As the presenter said, it must remain optional as not everything in life is binary. The potential exists for further abuse should some other unnecessary, untested, unsafe product, misclassified as a vaccine, be mandated.
Client-side scanning records a screen shot of everything you do on-line every few seconds. It then uses the AI assistant to read everything you’ve done and report anything directly to the server which can then pass it to Police who can then turn up at your door. This is well explained by IT expert Rob Braxman (2025) in a video titled Kill Privacy Forever! They Will Mandate an App to Watch You! Client Side Scanning at
. This is the tech companies’ ‘solution’ to the problem of getting around encryption. It looks at what you are doing on your device before it goes through any encryption and so doesn’t need to crack it! Apple, Google and Microsoft have programs to do this on your device already – Apple Neural Hash then Mediaanalysisd, Microsoft Windows Recall and Google System Safety Core. Braxman has been shouting about the dangers of this on his channel for years, with few taking any notice. But it is now here, waiting for the full functionality of the surveillance to be turned on. Any communist country leader or any dictator would love this as technology can now have eyes on every citizen24/7! Hitler would be in raptures!
Braxman implores people to speak up about the unacceptability of this NOW. Joe Rogan has recently spoken of his work on air. He shows a photo of British MPs with a placard outside Westminster saying: Police our streets, not our Tweets. He says CSAM, which is about child pornography is a cover. The intelligence agencies have wanted this capability all along and CSAM is simply an attempt to normalise this invasive behaviour. The sneakiness and mendacity of this approach is evident in it being able to label you as weird if you don’t believe in protecting against CSAM! They’ve already convinced you that surveillance is normal with 24/7 tracking on your phone. What’s the problem if you have nothing to hide? But you better not have anything to hide because they will get you. You better not oppose anything, or you’ll have your social media or internet cut off. This is not so thinly disguised Mafia tactics to bring about monopoly and control. He says of the Trojan Horse age verification requirement that “CSAM is a SCAM”. He says privacy will be dead forever if people don’t step up and speak up. Can you imagine a more chilling effect on free speech? Depending on who is in power, those in opposition will cower in fear. Police will knock on your door. Of course, children need to be protected, but not the way that has been selected here, which serves other agendas and fails to satisfactorily address the real problem anyway!
Conclusion
The above sections, together with my Substack Post #50, provide the evidence of decades of deliberate, focused activity designed to enslave humanity into an inescapable Digital Prison, policed by AI with no facility for rebuttal, probation, appeal or release. This has required enormous coordination and delivery effort over decades. This can only have been accomplished with the intent and support of those ruling/ controlling/ steering the corporations and governments of the world. They appear to have set up cartels that have colluded towards this objective as a means of achieving monopoly market dominance that could then be extorted for great profit, while dovetailing with their overarching eugenics plan.
We seem to be headed in the same direction that Germany, under the background leadership of Austria, took in the first half of last century with the subversion of its democracy. We badly need to learn the lessons of history and join the dots on recent events, lest we stumble and bumble our way into repeating what happened last time.
All involved in this need to be immediately arrested, have their assets frozen and prosecutions immediately commenced by public prosecutors and/ or aggrieved parties.
Action
Necessary actions from Government to avoid ongoing liability are:
APS to terminate or amend supplier contracts.
DFAT to apply Sanctions.
ASIC to revoke licences to operate.
NACC to conduct due diligence on what former politicians and public officials did in office that they may now be profiting from through having subsequently accepted private sector roles.
Attorney General to investigate and prosecute Julie Bishop and to prosecute the eSafety Commissioner for failing to identify the biggest eSafety threat the country has ever faced.
ACCC to investigate and prosecute monopoly and Cartel behaviour.
AFP to investigate and charge individuals.
All Ministers to direct their departments to review and amend all current contracts.
Parliament to repeal any legislation or treaties supporting any form of Digital Slavery and abolish the AFCA and explain to the Australian people the need for these measures.
Parliament to ban Digital ID and CBDCs, Crypto currency trading on human body activity data under Microsoft WIPO Patent WO2020060606 and Insertion of computer chips or other devices into peoples’ bodies, devices supporting social engineering and age restrictions to social media.
Treasurer to repatriate all Australian Federal gold reserves and holdings to Australia and order an investigation to determine how much gold that Goldcorp has allowed to leave the country.
1. Health Minister to suspend all Covid and mRNA supply contracts, exit Australia from the WHO and suspend ANY and ALL vaccine collaboration with the EU, the US, the UK and China.
These will be expanded in detail in a later Post.
The following are actions individuals can take personally:
1. When considering where to shop, recognise the red flag of businesses installing doors on their non refrigerated products. These doors will have the capacity to be locked requiring Digital ID and/ or biometric scan to open. Their company will be on board with this whole agenda, so shop there at your own risk. The trifling checkout convenience of billing you automatically as you select each item is a Trojan Horse for you being surveilled and controlled. It will also cost the jobs of checkout staff. It will also multiply exponentially the number of transactions that the bank can charge a fee for, and your transaction history will become invasive, long and unmanageable.
2. Any outlet that starts requiring QR check-in codes, Digital ID or facial recognition, or stops accepting cash is providing good reason to go elsewhere or to go without. The UN SDGs will do this to you soon enough anyway and suffering it upfront now can make a difference.
3. If you receive any request or demand to sign up to the Digital ID, consider the irrevocable exposure to the risk of extreme consequences that making such a non-retractable commitment will subject you to. This is outlined in detail in my Substack Post #50. If you get into trouble after you’ve signed up, no one will be able to rescue you– unless and until the whole system crashes. You’ll only expose yourself to being trafficked off via arbitration, as Post #50 explains. Digitisation opens you up to all sorts of low- and high-level online scams and other predatory corporate and private crimes, hacks, system manipulations and system failures, both deliberate and accidental. It leaves you with no peace of mind, and no possible recourse. You can’t contain digitalisation. You have no control over it. Somebody else does, and all the above demonstrates that they certainly don’t have your best interests at heart. You will be trusting psychopaths to not kill you! How do you think that’s going to turn out? So, consider declining, deferring or delaying any decision, and getting other people you know to do the same, especially if it comes with any threat, mandate or bribe, all of which are major red flags.
As Dr Mike Yeadon (2025) said, agreeing/ signing up to it will be the last really important decision you will ever make. You then officially won’t exist as you anymore, replaced by a QR Code address to some resources that can be edited by whoever controls whatever system you’ve been tricked into. You will lose all control and be forced to beep your way through life, continually identifying yourself, even to buy mouldy bread made on insect flour! The worse the threatened retribution, the more you can be sure it’s a bad thing. They might want to rush us, but we have no need to rush. They can’t fire everybody, at least, not yet. There’s enough power among us if we all take our courage in our hands. There’re millions of us and only hundreds to perhaps thousands of them controlling all this. You only need courage when you are threatened. You need some courage now. We can’t rely on anyone in power at any level of any government to save us from this one now. We have to do it ourselves. And we can – if we all act together, en-masse, immediately, as soon as any coercion or bribery is sprung upon us. We need to be very careful with our choices NOW as choice and free will will be a thing of the past if this counterfeit system is allowed to take hold.
We need to find patience, clarity and the courage to decline, say no and put up with the inconvenience, until this counterfeit system built on trickery and deception crumbles. Courage is greatly needed, right now. The return on our personal investment in doing this will be enormous.
In the coercively controlled world we live in, it seems that the higher up you go in any organisation, the harder it is to escape this influence. New World Order tentacles are seemingly everywhere. Everyone can be coerced, almost right the way to the top. But numbers demonstrating courage can make a big difference, anywhere and at any level.
Industry insider Rob Braxman, as mentioned above, clearly confirmed what all are aware of in the industry – that all the infrastructure is in place, so there’s nothing anyone can do to stop that part of it now. We’ve been asleep and deceived but there’s no going back. It’s done!
But what the country/ world can still do is stop transacting digitally and go back to using cash and cheques. You could also go to one of the many Digital Detox Retreat Centres that are springing up around the world. Or you could do a free digital detox for some days at home by not using any devices for that period. Batteries would still need to be removed from mobile phones as they still transmit when turned off. Entities we’ve trusted have previously locked us out. So we could lock ourselves out for a while. Find what you love and do that instead. Conducting our own distributed denial of using digital services would deprive the parasitic systems of data. If done by enough people, it would send a clear message that the public and the market require genuine choice. It wouldn’t need any mainstream media attention. It would mean turning off all digital items – phones (except in emergency), smart watches, fit bits, computers, TVs, Wi-Fi – all off at the wall or with their power source removed so they can’t still transmit while off. CB radios are another good option for short distance communication. You could also use airplane mode or do what the intelligence agencies do – factory reset your mobile phone and don’t use it anymore and only use landlines. De-Googled phones are another option.
This digital detoxing will be uncomfortable, but we’ll be much better prepared then and much healthier in the long term as well. You’ll probably enjoy talking F2F with family, friends and neighbours anyway! The young ones who have been marketed (= mind-controlled) into digital addiction will have the hardest time with this. You/ they could even go fishing, surfing, skiing, hiking, dancing, playing music, gardening, volunteering or anything you enjoy that’s good for you. But don’t take your digital electronic gadgets. (If that might compromise your safety, get a Faraday bag for your phone, and take it in that).
This action would be most effectively done simultaneously nationally or globally. So anyone who is set up for advocacy and coordination (which I am not) could pick this up and run with it. Withholding is power. Attention is power. If they want us to transact, then they can go back to cash, cheques and analogue i.e. not switch off alternative backup technology to get monopoly. Technology is great but it should be secondary and serving, not dominating.
The ongoing psychopathic criminal planned intention seems to be that all will be stolen, switched off or have access denied to us anyway, so doing a detox is good practice. Besides, with so many things having been switched over to digital now, you don’t actually have real title to anything much left now anyway. It’s most likely pre-stolen and on-sold already! You simply haven’t been told or haven’t realised it yet. But we can turn our backs to them. Corporations are dead invisible entities. The word is derived from ‘corpse’. When you don’t engage with them, they don’t exist.
This has all been well designed so that the increasing draconian restrictions frustrate and distract us long enough until we are dropped into full slavery – Chattel, Modern and Digital – by which time, it will be impossible to escape. The end time this is all heading for seems to be the end of personal freedom as we know it! The blockchain will be the digital handcuffs on you and your digital wallet. It’s a chain around your neck to drop you into bondage. You are being cuffed so you can be sent off to detention and subsequently trafficked to God-knows where. This is wilful, intentional criminal activity.
Volatile times require reliable stuff that works that’s truly ‘safe and effective’, that can’t be turned off on us to compel us into accepting dangerous monopoly products. Alternative systems need to be provided and maintained – as evident from the recent power blackout of Spain, Portugal and half of France. If neither the government nor big business is providing them, we’ll need to be organising to provide them ourselves by other means. Community groups, groups serving communities are a great place to start.
Any individual with the time and energy could also take out injunctions or restraining orders from local Magistrates against the tech companies to prevent them from using anything they had said or posted, as well as from using their personal data.
Declaration
Finally, even though I’m not saying anything here that’s not available on the public record, I still consider it necessary to protect myself from possible retribution for doing what should be anyone’s right in a serious democracy. I am happy and healthy, leading a purposeful life and have no suicidal ideation whatsoever. I am not accident prone. I take no drugs or medication.
Any attempt to impede the progress or circulation of the findings of my research by slander or electronic inhibitory means would contravene the scientific approach of the physical sciences, which requires free and open evaluation. Let my findings stand or fall on the strength of argument and alignment with fact and truth, rather than on emotive matters of ideological belief or the manipulations of marketing/ social science. That is nothing more than what would naturally occur in a truly democratic country.
The very fact that I even need to say this speaks volumes for the current state of our society and the subversion of our democracy. Whatever gaslighting people may wish to come up with to the contrary, we no longer have the freedoms we thought we had. If you doubt that something untoward is going on somewhere, then you might look at McGrath (2025c) Substack Post #47 at https://stephenmcgrathphd.substack.com/p/the-psychopathic-eugenics-agenda . It shows former Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir, very clearly setting out in 2015 the New World Order’ eugenics agenda. He was speaking the year after Malaysian Airlines MH370 mysteriously disappeared over the Indian Ocean and MH17 was shot down over Ukraine four months later. Two aircraft from one airline? One wonders whether that was the means of forcing Malaysia into some dodgy deal or some international group it didn’t want to join or play along with. The global digital court dealt with in McGrath (2025b) Substack Post #50 at https://stephenmcgrathphd.substack.com/p/digital-slavery-for-australia-and, perhaps?
As I said, I am only going on publicly available information. I did have to dig hard to find it, as mainstream media has reported little of it.
References
60_Minutes_Australia 2025, Will AI steal yr job? , Channel 9, viewed 2/9/2025, <
>.
A_Current_Affair 2025, Small businesses’ social media accounts shut down without warning,
>.
Álvarez-Pallete, JM 2022, About paradoxes and digital slavery, viewed 17/8/2025, <https://www.telefonica.com/en/communication-room/blog/about-paradoxes-and-digital-slavery/>.
Austin-Fitts, C 2025a, Human sovereignty and agency in the age of technocracy: A dialogue with catherine austin fitts Propaganda in Focus, viewed 30/9/2025, <
>.
Austin-Fitts, C 2025b, The danger of digital currencies viewed 1/7/2025, <
>.
BaliProcess 2025, The bali process, viewed 3/9/2025, <
Home Page
>.
BBC 2025, How AI uses our drinking water – BBC World Service, viewed 20/9/2025, <
>.
Black, S 2025, We found the hidden cost of data centers. It’s in your electric bill, More Perfect Union, viewed 20/9/2025, <
>.
Braxman, R 2025, Kill privacy forever! They will mandate an app to watch you! Client side scanning, viewed 30/8/2025, <
>.
Cadwalladr, C 2025, This is what a digital coup looks like viewed 1/6/2025, <
>.
Chisnall, M 2020, Are we becoming digital slaves? Why online ‘privacy’ is a misnomer, Lnndon School of Economics and Political Science, viewed 15/8/2025, <https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/businessreview/2020/03/04/are-we-becoming-digital-slaves-why-online-privacy-is-a-misnomer/>.
De_Aguinaga, SG 2025, British Institute of International and Comparative Law, viewed 18/8/2025, <https://www.biicl.org/blog/48/supplying-governments-amidst-modern-slavery-provisions-in-public-procurement>.
DW_Documentary 2024, How big AI companies exploit data workers in kenya, viewed 2/10/2025, <
>.
Forrest, A 2017, On modern slavery with andrew forrest MNC World News, viewed 2/9/2025, <
>.
Forrest, A & Yemini, A 2025, Why this billionaire aussie mining magnate is suddenly going green, Rebel News, viewed 2/9/2025, <
>.
Fortescue_Metals_Group 2024, Modern slavery statement, viewed 13/8/2025, <https://edge.sitecorecloud.io/fortescue17114-fortescueeb60-productionbbdb-8be5/media/project/fortescueportal/shared/docs/default-source/2824838.pdf >.
Frank’s_World_of_Data_Science_&_AI 2025, How AI datacenters eat the world, Frank’s World, viewed 30/9/2025, <https://www.franksworld.com/2025/09/01/how-ai-datacenters-eat-the-world/ >.
Green, J 2018, Who cleans up the mess when an australian uranium mining company leaves africa?, The Ecologist, viewed 5/9/2025, <https://theecologist.org/2018/jun/18/who-cleans-mess-when-australian-uranium-mining-company-leaves-africa>.
Hawley, J 2025, Parents of suicide victim testify at senate judiciary committee hearing about AI chatbot dangers viewed 19/9/2025 <
>.
Hoenderkamp, R 2025, Digital ids torn to shreds as ‘fabian autocrats’ wet dream’ exposed in chilling ‘shackles’ warning, GB News, viewed 2/10/2025, <
>.
Kaiser, B 2018, Brittany kaiser, former cambridge analytica director: ‘I voted for bernie’, The_Guardian, viewed 3/7/2025, <
>.
Kennedy, JFJ & Gates, W 1997, Oh! Say can you see… George Magazine – Survival Guide to the Future, viewed 29/6/2025, <https://ia803204.us.archive.org/19/items/george-magazine-february-1997-survival-guide-to-the-future-bill-gates-interview/GeorgeMagazine_February1997_SurvivalGuideToTheFuture_Bill_Gates_Interview.pdf>.
Marcus, G 2025, A knockout blow for llms?, Substack, viewed 13/6/2025, <
>.
Martinez, J 2025, This is an extinction level event” CIA MKUltra whistleblower james martinez is sounding the alarm, Redacted, viewed 19/8/2025, <
>.
McGrath, SK 2025a, Patent wo2020060606 crypto currency system using your body activity data (p#38), https://stephenmcgrathphd.substack.com/p/patent-wo2020060606-crypto-currency>.
McGrath, SK 2025b, Digital slavery for australia and the world imminent under global digital court (#50), Substack, https://stephenmcgrathphd.substack.com/p/digital-slavery-for-australia-and>.
McGrath, SK 2025c, The psychopathic eugenics agenda clearly exposed in 2015 (p#47), viewed 24/7/2025, <https://open.substack.com/pub/stephenmcgrathphd/p/the-psychopathic-eugenics-agenda?r=50bzb0&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true>.
Pietropaoli, I & Di-Vetta, G 2025, The future of corporate liability: Why the ‘failure to prevent’ model matters for human rights due diligence regulation2025, British Institute of International and Comparative Law, viewed 18/8/2025, <https://www.biicl.org/blog/114/the-future-of-corporate-liability-why-the-failure-to-prevent-model-matters-for-human-rights-due-diligence-regulation>.
Pressley, A & Ojeda, R 2025, Ayanna pressley destroys trump’s child DNA scheme, viewed 3/9/2025, <
>.
Shojaee, P, Mirzadeh, I, Alizadeh, K, Horton, M, Bengio, S & Farajtabar, M 2025, ‘The illusion of thinking: Understanding the strengths and limitations of reasoning models via the lens of problem complexity’, Apple Machine Learning Research.
Smith, C 2025, I convinced grok god is real (using math, science, and logic) viewed 12/8/2025, <
>.
Swan, T 2025, Questioning chat gpt, viewed 6/9/2025, <https://www.facebook.com/100022389752064/videos/1086596022968533>.
Trump, I 2009, The trump card: Playing to win in work and life, viewed 2/9/2025, <https://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/2933951.Ivanka_Trump>.
Turner, B 2024, Big changes are coming… Concerning UK AI bill you won’t hear in the media… GBNews, viewed 2/9/2025, <
>.
Webb, W 2022, How elites will create a new class of slaves, Glenn Beck Podcast,
>.
Webb, W 2025a, The moment has come to reveal everything, Business Core, viewed 15/8/2025, <
>.
Webb, W 2025b, Don’t be fooled with what’s about to happen, Cross stitch world, viewed 1/9/2025, <
>.
Williams, E 2024, Artificial intelligence – a systems view Engineers Australia On Demand Seminars, viewed 27/2/2025, <.
Williams, T 2025, Puzzles break advanced AI models, apple research finds: Experts suggest reasoning has ‘the illusion of thinking’, Australian Information Age viewed 13/6/2025 <https://ia.acs.org.au/article/2025/puzzles-break-advanced-ai-models-apple-research-finds.html?ref=newsletter&deliveryName=DM26477>.
Wingardh , V 2025, AI now denying your healthcare (and its getting worse) Propublica, viewed 1/10/2025, <
>.
Winkleman, S 2025, The most compelling argument against tech in schools viewed 26/9/2025, <
>.
World_International_Patents_Office 2020, Patent wo2020060606 crypto currency system using body activity data. , viewed 22/5/2025, <https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2020060606&_cid=P21-MAYVUJ-76820-1>.
Yeadon, M 2025, Digital ID warning, viewed 13/8/2025, <https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1Dzbxv6m3F/?mibextid=wwXIfr >.