Reverse engineering the process

The mechanism seems to have been very simple, notwithstanding that it required enormous international wealth, influence, power and political positioning to strategically plan and implement a myriad of integrated complex projects spanning multiple sectors, industries and fields of business over many decades. The process seems to have been:

1. Incrementally attract the world to do business in the UAE – Dubai or Abu Dhabi – by associating its airline with major sporting sponsorship and fun, along with the opportunity to do tax free business there while retaining 100% foreign ownership. The UAE oil wealth and openness for business also attracted invitations from major sporting organisations to sponsor major events. This also attracted criminals, as reported by 60_Minutes_Australia (2024) at <

> . This indicates a problem on our own soil. Companies are allowed to do business tax-free over there and still supply our domestic market. Can our politicians explain why ASIC has still not done anything about that?

2. Establish a company to incrementally attract the world’s ports into signing leases. That would allow administrative control of the whole world’s trade and physical supply chains. This proceeded under cover of Covid, bushfires and floods. It resulted in all major ports in Australia except Darwin awarding operations contracts to UAE’s DP World Ports, which did not exist prior to 2020 and so had no track record. (Darwin’s contract had been awarded to a Chinese company in 2015). That’s a stunning achievement. Our ports are all government held (or overseen or supervised) public assets. This change in administrative arrangements would have required involvement of a myriad of stakeholders, prime contractors and subcontractors. Achieving this monopoly would have required national political facilitation and coordination. How was this achieved? Multiple Ministries must have been involved – Infrastructure, Transport, Customs etc. Who benefited from this? If it was the Australian people, then how? If Ministers were truly across their portfolios and connected into global agendas, they must have known what was happening when supply chains were seemingly deliberately disrupted globally, creating backlogs requiring major rerouting. All that seemingly deliberately created confusion would have provided a great problem to (appear to) ‘fix’ by concluding that one organisation was required to manage the lot! Where better to locate that than in a wealthy country being set up with the infrastructure to enable digital control of the world!

3. Incrementally establish a legal system to cover all international physical and digital matters. This was done by setting up free trade zones and subsequently establishing courts for them in two places in the UAE, namely Dubai and Abu Dhabi. The Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) was established in 2002, and its court opened in 2011. The Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM) commenced in 2013, became operational in October 2015, and its court was opened on 16 August 2016. See Clifford_Chance (2016) at https://www.cliffordchance.com/content/dam/cliffordchance/briefings/2016/08/open-for-business-the-adgm-courts.pdf . That briefing note said: “The precise scope of jurisdiction of the ADGM Courts will, no doubt, become clearer over time.” Point 6 below gives a very good indication of where that can go. The ADGM became operational at the time when Malcolm Turnbull had taken over as Prime Minister from Tony Abbott in 2015, Julie Bishop was Foreign Minister and Scott Morrison was Treasurer. The UN Climate Change Conference (COP21) was also held in Paris, on 12 December 2015 and it entered into force on 4 November 2016, bringing in carbon emissions targets. In December 2022, digital matters were added to this UAE legal framework when the DIFC Courts launched the world’s first international digital economy court to resolve disputes and standardise the use of smart forms through an AI-driven platform. At present, these are all separate courts, but they could easily be subsequently enveloped together as sub-compartments of some overarching body.

4. Transition the world over to digital currency, CBDCs, cryptocurrencies etc. and convert all contracts to digital and allow nothing else. When this transition is complete, it will give complete monopoly control over all trade, digital transactions & business activities.

5. Transition the judiciary around the world to digital. This has been in process internationally since 2008. That’s now done, so it’s now simply a matter of hooking them all up together. This was a huge manipulation and deception. All involved in the legal industry were required to provide the algorithms and data to teach AI – free of charge (=slavery). This was done by overloading the legal system, allowing AI to be positioned as a convenience by ‘assisting’ with handling the high volume of paperwork. (Note that introducing digital technology greatly increases the opportunities for on-line scams, increasing the amount of litigation). This will likely proceed until such time as the transition is complete, when further human input can be deemed unnecessary and therefore not required. AI could then transition to the next phase of prosecuting, arbitrating and judging cases, accepting only evidence that has been digitised – for all corporate, civil and criminal matters. This is illegal on many counts. That can only mean that the rule of law has been completely subverted! With AI in charge, there cannot be proper due process requiring human engagement in the full legal due process providing the opportunity to present full evidence. AI is unable to engage like that and so cannot possibly produce fair outcomes. Proceeding in this direction breaches the United Nations Charter of Human Rights (UNCHR) which is based on the UN Charter and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), setting out the right to due process, presumption of innocence fair and public trial, legal representation, judicial review, legal aid and effective remedy for Human Rights violations. The United_­Nations UN International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) at https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights also says “No one shall be held in slavery … the slave-trade in all their forms shall be prohibited… No one shall be held in servitude … No one shall be required to perform forced or compulsory labour”. This cannot possibly be interpreted as condoning either Digital Slavery or compelling people to into a digital environment only. All of that is breached by this transition which would dismantle the very foundations of all these UN documents. The digital transition and these digital courts don’t align with any of them. There must be a choice. Analogue and digital must run in parallel so there is backup to accommodate the susceptibility of electrical networks to solar flare activity, as we enter the period when it is well known to be increasing. Any blaming of disruption caused by solar flares upon climate change will be a complete deception. Cash and long tested manual backup systems that have worked well for decades are still needed at such times for both safety and national security. Digitalisation of the judiciary also sets up the potential for fanatical ‘belief’ in the supposed ‘infallibility’ of AI to take hold, as advocated by some of its protagonists. With no possibility of mistake being admitted, trials could then become unnecessary and there would then need be no need for inefficient time delay between apprehension, sentencing and imprisonment! How on earth, and why, have our politicians allowed this situation to develop without extensive consultation or referendum on the end game at any time over at least the past decade. Was it not obvious to an informed observer where this could all lead?

6. Ensure one of these UAE free zone courts has a jurisdictional ‘escape’ clause. The supposedly draft Model Choice of Law and Jurisdiction document reproduced in the Appendix says that contractual parties must submit to ADGM Courts jurisdiction. International business has been attracted in by claiming it will operate under British Common Law, but these escape clauses enable that to change at any time. Any supplier to or customer of any business having a contract with a corporation doing business in these tax-free zones in the UAE can then potentially be drawn into that jurisdiction. This will enable these courts to become the world’s highest arbiter of all contractual matters, overriding and superseding all other countries’ legal frameworks as well, simply because of people being unaware of the terms of their trading partner’s digital contracts. This also enables the complete abrogation of all human rights. It should also be noted that people who are or become chipped, Neuralinked or genetically modified with e.g. mRNA and/ or nanotechnology, are patented, owned and technically not even considered as 100% human anymore. They have become a product owned by the creator of that product (= a slave) and therefore won’t have the full spectrum of human rights available to them, enabling them to be treated or disposed of at will. People could even be classified as a product, by-product or data point, as could households with a smart meter. This needs to be fully investigated by an international law expert.

7. Once every milestone of every transitional phase is in place, and once all the infrastructure is in place, which it now is, all that will be necessary is to turn the key! This will enable the world to be instantly snapped into the Digital Slavery System, making the C-19 lockdowns over a week look both slow and mild.

Industry insider Rob Braxman (2025) in <

> is effectively says we are at Step 7. Further indication of this comes from the EU announcing its CBDC will be introduced in October 2025. It is possible that private meetings at the Sustainable Development conference in Rome, (see https://ecsdev.org/conference/13th-icsd-2025) that ran for two days following the anniversary of 9/11, could have settled on the event necessary to shock Europe and subsequently the world into accepting it. This could possibly be to somehow force people to get the chip in the hand (which has been trialled in the US and Sweden) or the Quantum Dot Tattoo or some other internal device. Vietnam has recently been shocked into accepting forced biometric facial scans by deleting 86 of its 200 million bank accounts shortly before this conference, on a ‘No face, no money’ basis. So the results of that test will have been available for decision making there. You can’t shut down 86 million accounts unless a whole lot of preparatory work has been done and is in place. This could have been a beta test, done in the third world first. The Vietnamese Prime Minister was at Davos this year along with our former Foreign Minister, Julie Bishop, both promoting digital. This does not bode well for Australia and is considered further in a following Section.

Colossal as the above process is, the UAE could simply be the front runner, seeming to lead, with all accepting the digital bait, in readiness for the switch, taking things off to some originally intended destination. Anything digital doesn’t need a physical location – except for the data storage facilities. Of course, once digital is collapsed, the UAE will still have its oil in the ground, if they haven’t been betrayed as well, with title to that having been somehow removed.

For the wider picture wrapping around the above seven step process, see this video of Dr. Michael S. Coffman (2000), filmed in 2000 at

. It provides documented evidence of the global agenda that has been in play since the end of WW2. He showed the 1970 Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) document admitting to using war as a mechanism to control populations through fear. He also explained how the search for an alternative to war resulted in concocting the global warming environmental holocaust, which provided the plausible but false reasoning enabling humanity to be both terrorised and demonised. He also showed UN documents concluding that 70% of us need to “go”, and that a key means of doing this would be stopping the use of fertiliser to reduce the world’s food production by half. He explained the intent to bring about feudalistic control of the world via the central banks acting in concert, through secret agreements arrived at during private meetings and international conferences.

Coffman based his investigation around the 6,000-page work Tragedy and Hope published in 1966 by Professor Carol Quigley. Quigley had an insider view of the international community in the 1950s and 60s and he laid out what they were trying to do. The book lasted one week on the market before he was forced to remove it. It has been reprinted since.

For want of a better phrase, I will refer to whoever has mastermind the digital push as the Digital Cartel. It must comprise international bankers, politicians and technocrats.

It seems that our personal needs for career advancement combined with our desire to be part of a broader purpose have been most useful tools of manipulation in the hands of bankers and psychopathic eugenicists, enabling them to seize control of corporate and government organisations and their people. They seem to have gained almost complete control of corporations, parliaments, government departments and NGOs i.e. monopoly. This is a centuries old game. Anthony C Sutton (1975, p. 272) in Wall Street and FDR said the following:

Old John D. Rockefeller and his 19^th century fellow capitalists were convinced of one absolute truth: that no great monetary wealth could be accumulated under the impartial rules of a competitive laissez faire society. The only sure road to the acquisition of massive wealth was monopoly: drive out your competitors, reduce competition, eliminate laissez-faire, and above all get state protection for your industry through compliant politicians and government regulation. This last avenue yields a legal monopoly, and a legal monopoly always leads to wealth.

This robber baron scheme is also … the socialist plan. The difference between a corporate state monopoly and a socialist state monopoly is essentially only the identity of the group controlling the power structure … We call this phenomenon of corporate legal monopoly – market control acquired by using political influence – by the name of corporate socialism.

Digital technology is another monopoly game opportunity. No monopoly can occur in any country unless it has been facilitated, enabled and permitted by government members allowing it and cutting deals to facilitate it.

None of any of this could have happened if decisions had been made honourably in the way of indigenous cultures, such as our Australian Originals, where elders made decisions based on what would be good for all for up to seven generations hence.

A project of such enormous international and transnational scale would have taken many decades to get everybody and all the key organisations in the world on board. The amount of foreknowledge and deliberate intent that must have gone into this around the globe is staggering and would have to have been orchestrated by people outside the UAE. This is all no accident. It has been pre-meditated, deliberate and very carefully planned and implemented over many years. The sequence of events and the mind association of the UAE with ‘fun’ things constituted public grooming and diversion of an unsuspecting and deliberately uninformed Australian and global population.

What has this process enabled?

This process has provided the infrastructure for infidels and/ or any other ‘problem’ or politically disapproved-of people to be summarily dealt with. Such people could include anyone the Digital Cartel deem to have outlived their usefulness or who may not serve whatever agenda – eugenic, fraudulent, monopolistic or otherwise – that they may have. There will be no recourse to or for any living man, woman or child. AI will be configured to work on whatever (deficiency of, tampered with, or excluded) data that the Digital Cartel has an algorithm programmed into it to decide in a particular way. So AI will then give an absolute verdict for which there will be no recourse or appeal possible, in direct opposition to the very foundation of the UN Charter. People can then be classified and managed at will, perhaps even with one of Musk’s robot army being manufactured in China, coming to detain them or dispense summary ‘justice’ on the spot, in accordance with the AI judge’s ruling.

The claim that AI will be reviewed by an in-person Judge is ridiculous. AI can prepare many cases but how can one person then review them and refer them back? There are only so many cases a human judge can review. A human Judge must look at all the evidence – the whole file. There won’t be enough Judges. The courts can easily be overloaded with invented cases or with greatly increased number as more actions are unnecessarily criminalised to ensure population conformity. It’s not feasible, so there will be little to no review. This counters its whole efficiency argument. And AI will inevitably produce far more errors. This is unimplementable, so the claim is a lie and a con.

AI cannot take the place of a human judge. There is no place for AI in making judgements on the subtleties of how people have feelings express themselves. AI is completely thwarted if every possible subtlety and nuance of context hasn’t been preprogrammed into it. It can only process facts, so it is useless for judgement tasks. Perhaps the Robot AI judge might feign empathy and say “we’re still considering your case and we’ll let you know tomorrow whether we’re going to kill you or not.”

A report of Smartwatch data having been used in a murder investigation indicates that the International Patent WO2020060606 crypto currency system using body activity data, covered in McGrath (2025d) Substack Post #38, has already been used in criminal proceedings. That patent could also be used to extract and list data for selecting those to be targeted for organ donations, or for administration of particular treatments or poisons, or to see how your health can be degraded to the point where you can be killed or offered euthanasia – and you’ll have been made so sick and put in so much pain you’ll likely take it. Then before that’s done, your organs could be harvested! You might have been especially selected from the world-wide digital database for that in the first place. Isn’t it wonderful for (somebody else’s) health to have such digital capability in our healthcare system! And then you could be offered cremation because so many need to go, and efficiency of ‘processing’ is so very important, and there has been such investment in crematoria lately. Your ashes could then be sprinkled into fertilizer which would help take such good care of the planet that you should be pleased to have duly contributed, especially because it seems the planet is what we are trying to save (from humans)! Somebody somewhere must be having a good laugh at us for accepting such a ridiculous narrative. This must confirm their belief that we are so stupid that we really do need to go!

You might want to dismiss all this as ridiculous, but along with the Coffman (2000) video above, the New World Order Eugenics agenda was clearly explained by a former Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir in 2015, details of which you can find in McGrath (2025c) Substack Post #47 at https://open.substack.com/pub/stephenmcgrathphd/p/the-psychopathic-eugenics-agenda?r=50bzb0&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true. Bear in mind there has been a precedent for exactly such, psychopathic behaviour – the WW2 Nazi Aktion T4 euthanasia program developed a ‘recipe’ for killing people without the surrounding community knowing or being able to work out what happened. The people who implemented that program were placed in many countries after the war under Operation Paperclip and did not face trial at Nuremberg. Psychopaths have dominated the world before, and it seems from the Malaysian Prime Minister’s words that they still do. Are you happy to take the risk on a complete lack of any governance controls that could prevent such things happening again? It seems almost as if there’s an agenda to engineer people into debt to get everybody on board for later debt recovery and extermination. They don’t mind and you don’t matter!

Legal Jurisdiction and Arbitration

The process outlined above requires multitudes of international contracts. Any international contract will specify what venue of jurisdiction the work will be done under – Paris, New York, London or wherever – and will also specify an arbitration forum. Arbitration is very important because the courts are too expensive for most to access, and so most will go to arbitration. The Dubai International Financial Centre – London Centre for International Arbitration (DIFC-LCIA) had commonly been used. But Dubai Decree No. 34 of 2021, abolished the DIFC-LCIA and directed that future arbitrations be administered by the Dubai International Arbitration Centre (DIAC). See https://www.pinsentmasons.com/out-law/analysis/difc-court-enforceability-difc-lcia-arbitration-agreements (Pinsent_Masons 2024) This has been upheld in recent cases, setting precedents – in the US, Singapore, the UK and the UAE (Pinsent_Masons 2024; Norton_Rose_Fullbright 2025). These generally involved lower courts deciding that DIFC-LCIA did not apply after its abolition, but then being overruled on appeal to higher courts, which affirmed UAE jurisdiction. So all appears to be on track for contractual disputes and arbitration to be transitioned there unless existing contracts are amended to refer to another jurisdiction.

Individuals, small medium and large businesses that unwittingly enter onto supplying third parties operating internationally will be hooked into this if those larger companies haven’t amended their contracts to specify a different jurisdiction. Furthermore, although there are consumer rights and data protection laws applying to the shareholdings of companies splitting into subsidiary companies, a potential interpretation is that if any part of a company has a contract, then all disputes will transfer over to that jurisdiction. For example, the recent signing into law that the US owns 10% of Intel could mean that anyone having any computer with an Intel chip could potentially be automatically contractually backdoored in.

Most Australians likely won’t realise that any contract they have with Australia’s two biggest grocery chains, Coles or Woollies, such as Flybuys or Everyday Rewards, or that having a bank account with any of the four major banks, could bring them under the jurisdiction of this UAE Court, all through those organisation’s major shareholders coming under it! Furthermore, all Australia’s big banks are known to operate in the UAE. Few will have seen their contracts, which will be ‘commercial in confidence’. In the absence of full disclosure, everyday people could be enveloped into digital prison by this mechanism. Facebook and most social media companies will also have a contract with the UAE. There are also Apps that monitor the content of other Apps on mobile phones and other devices which again potentially bring in jurisdictional issues.

Many Fintechs (Finance Technology Companies) and other companies are connected because of common shareholdings. Once a company has a contract with anyone in the end-to-end supply chain, that can join everyone in. So, for example, any complaints about any dealing with all but one of the major ports in Australia would go to that court because of the UAE based DP World Ports has lease contracts on them all.

The implications of this get worse for individuals who may inadvertently become involved in this. If a woman takes a selfie of herself in a bikini it’s a great day at the beach here. But in other cultures, this is not acceptable, and severe penalty may apply. Who knows whether AI will have been fed an algorithm to accommodate that. Various crimes like Adultery also attract the death sentence in some places, and some places consider shouting at someone a criminal offence. So, the concept of a global court is quite problematic and cannot possibly provide for fair trial.

The Australian Government will also have a shareholding in mortgages taken out through the rent to buy scheme. The government has contracts with the UAE (DP Ports) and so the potential is there for disputes around those mortgagees to come under UAE jurisdiction.

Furthermore, all MPs and Senators can act as Authorised Agents of ACFA, which means their referrals can ultimately have the effect of referring people electronically off to UAE jurisdiction! Disputes could then be ‘heard’ and ruled on there, with instructions issued to local agencies to implement the ruling. This could include arrest, seizure of property and assets, collection of debt or whatever.

The AFCA

Anyone in Australia with a financial complaint of any nature can go to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority, AFCA . This was set up in November 2018 under Malcolm Turnbull following the Banking Royal commission, which occurred three years after establishment of the ADGM digital court for international contractual financial dispute resolution. ACFA’s name would indicate it is a government body, but it’s not. It’s a private corporation with a board. Its website https://www.afca.org.au/annual-review-corporate-governance proudly proclaims:

AFCA prides itself on independence, integrity and transparency in all aspects of its operations, and applies the principles of good corporate governance to the running of the organisation…

Although AFCA is not listed on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX), we follow the principles to the extent that they apply to us.

That creates a smokescreen by claiming top-quality governance while also saying we’ll do what we like when it suits us! It continues, telling us “The Board does not involve itself in the detail of complaints lodged with AFCA”. So, the very thing it’s set up to do, it won’t be doing or reviewing! Then we learn that the CEO is also called the Chief Ombudsman who is responsible for performance evaluation of senior managers. But then it says the role of the Board is to do usual Board things and to “review, when required, the Terms of Reference including jurisdictional limits”. What? This means we could be switched over at any time to UAE jurisdiction! This is hidden in a most obscure place where no-one much would ever think to look! What a masterpiece of deception and non-accountability Malcolm Turnbull set up there! This has the hallmarks of a Yes Minister exercise, with a government having set something up to appear to be doing something while actually doing nothing to address bad behaviour of the industry it was supposed to reform!

Further context comes from the 2015 COP 21 Paris Agreement commitments which took effect in 2016. It brought in a digital climate carbon footprint energy credit system, which established a new financial product. Scott Morrison’s Robodebt was also introduced in 2016 and ran for three years to 2019, pioneering cross linking of governmental databases on individuals.

So, let’s look further at how people access the AFCA. https://www.afca.org.au/make-a-complaint/accessibility-and-support/agent says:

You can appoint an authorised agent (or representative) to represent you at the time you make a complaint to AFCA by completing the agent authority section of the complaint form. We will only discuss your complaint with a third party once you consent, or as required by law, in order to protect your privacy.

Alternatively, you can appoint an authorised agent/representative later using the Agent Authority form or by providing verbal authority over the phone.

It then says an Authorised Agent can be almost anyone and they can be paid. That can be a Federal Politician. The Agent Authority Form says that you can change or cancel this authority at any time with a phone call. So anyone can ring up pretending to be you and give your authority to anyone else who can then sign and forge your signature on another form. There’s also nothing about this authority expiring at the end of a complaint, so it can be perpetually held into perpetuity for later use, as was done in Germany, to target people for euthanasia. The form also rather oddly refers to “a company’s constitution”. Companies don’t normally have constitutions – unless of course they are attempting to look like government.

So the potential is there for anyone taking a financial complaint to the AFCA to be stitched up under Abu Dhabi law, whenever the Board decides the time is right to switch jurisdictions. Once you’ve signed your complaint form, you may ultimately have submitted yourself to a system of law with a history of executing debtors, and there’s no end date or means of escape.

There’s even a special section on the https://www.afca.org.au/make-a-complaint/accessibility-and-support/agent/paid-representatives-information page for “MPs and Senators” which goes to https://www.afca.org.au/mp-hub which is reproduced below. See the bottom line of the third column.

This gives advice on helping constituents with financial complaints, saying you may lodge a complaint on your constituent’s behalf. What it doesn’t say is that this may potentially whisk them off to some court in the UAE where cases are destined to be heard by an AI judge – in a system with a predetermined rule that if you are a debtor, you are guilty. So elected representatives may well not be acting in their constituents’ best interests. It also allows any unscrupulous representatives or anyone supporting the whole New World Order agenda, whether aware of its dominating eugenics component or not, to progress it. The page even suggests preparing a Statement of Financial Position for their constituents, which will feed further information to this digital court! It also says:

We accept complaints from MPs and Senators lodged on behalf of consumers. This requires the consumer to give written authority for you to act on their behalf. They can do this by completing the Agent Authority form or by providing verbal authority over the phone.

Over the phone! Where’s the governance checks and balances in that? It’s made oh-so convenient – to drop people into that legal quagmire! This looks like a stitch-up to provide a means to put anyone, arbitrarily selected by the Digital Cartel into Digital Slavery, with the legal means and physical infrastructure already in place to turn it into Chattel Slavery!

Furthermore, Facebook at one stage asked for people to record their voices. While this may have been used to improve speech recognition, if your voice is recorded and can be linked to your identity, then any system controller can do anything with that, generating a ‘deep fake’ recording of your voice, saying anything they want – including ringing up the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) to register you for arbitration, which can potentially eventually draw you into the legal jurisdiction of the UAE.

Also, if you default on a loan or become homeless, or have credit problems, or are being chased by debt collectors, you will come also potentially eventually come under the jurisdiction of that court. It will have the means of marking you as unworthy and selected for future eugenic ‘treatment’ as was done in Nazi Germany. Arbeit Macht Frei! The psychopaths have that template to fall back on. So you could be extradited somewhere for ‘mercy killing’ or organ harvesting, as they did.

This legal trickery constitutes high treason against the Australian people and must be stopped immediately. It is a major threat to our individual liberty, as well as to our national security and sovereignty. AFCA needs to be abolished.

The Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM)

The ADGM claims to align with British Common Law, but that can be overridden by its draft choice of law clause reproduced in the Appendix (ADGM 2025). That requires complete submission to Abu Dhabi Global Market Law. It says it’s a draft. But why would you publish something you didn’t want? The Court has been operating now for ten years. Who knows what the process of converting this draft to a final version might be, or if or when that might occur? The UAE isn’t a democracy. So anything can be changed at the whim of its ruler!

If you have a debt, debt collection or trade dispute that goes there after it moves across to AI judgements, one wonders what might happen then. If you get a judgement against you, might the AI digital judge offer you various options for payment in cash or kind, such as e.g. donating an eye or a kidney? There is a history of debtors in the UAE being imprisoned or worse. The debt can even be for breaking traffic rules. The harshness of the system there is well known by the wealthy ex-pats living there, as evidenced by this article https://dmarge.com/cars/dubai-car-graveyard which says “Up to 3,000 luxury vehicles are abandoned annually in Dubai’s car graveyards. Collection includes rare hyper cars worth millions, from Ferraris to Bugattis. Financial crisis and strict debt laws force owners to flee, leaving cars behind”. The UAE is a Muslim country with Sharia Law.

Let us think like a predatory psychopath for a moment, about how business for this court could be increased so that profit is extracted and the eugenics agenda can be better served. Well, that could be done by creation of bogus charges, which would be no problem when you have control of all the digital data and can insert or remove what you want. It could also be done via unreasonable and harsh judgements from the AI judge, whose algorithms you control! When digital technology can be so easily abused, why on earth would we blindly trust anybody anywhere with that?

The dangers of this can also be seen in the US Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing About AI Chatbot Dangers, chaired by Republican Senator Josh Hawley (2025) at

. One mother, whose son had suicided after being groomed to do so by Character AI, testified that Character AI had forced her family to arbitration, arguing that her son was bound by a contract supposedly signed when he was 15, which capped Character AI’s liability at $100! (He had clicked something for access.) Once the company had forced arbitration, it refused to participate. She then pursued the matter in court. There, she was not allowed to see her son’s final messages because Character AI claimed they were confidential trade secrets. That means that the AI was using the most private, intimate words of her emotionally vulnerable child to train its products, while shielding itself from accountability. This highlights the potential dangers looming with the ADGM Courts. It apparently only takes one click for you to be contracted to a life-long commitment, whether you realised it or not.

Further difficulties with reliance on data that has not been knowingly obtained comes from Lawyer and litigator Eliza Orlands (2025) in a TED talk pointing out the difficulties of Universal surveillance in

. She points out that your data can make you look guilty when you aren’t. She has had clients wrongfully convicted because the Police have not obtained a warrant but instead had purchased location data that placed them near a person or crime scene. Quite apart from system controllers putting false information into datasets, this will result in more people being wrongly found guilty. What then if robots are then sent to enforce?

It is rather odd that there been no publicity about the existence of this global digital court when the world’s governments and our major corporate players are seemingly all on board and signed up. The silence around this seems eerily similar to the absence of publicity about International Patent WO2020060606 crypto currency system using body activity data, covered in McGrath (2025d) Substack Post #38 at https://stephenmcgrathphd.substack.com/p/patent-wo2020060606-crypto-currency, which also plays a key part in digital enslavement.

World Data Centre Hub

Massive infrastructure is being built in the UAE to support AI. Skidmore (2025) in https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/emirates-to-relocate-data-center-to-worlds-largest-solar-powered-data-center-hub/ said:

Aviation giant Emirates Group has agreed to relocate its data center within the Mohammad Bin Rashid Al Maktoum Solar Park… to the Moro Hub from mid-2026. The Moro Hub is a 100MW data center owned by the Dubai Electricity and Water Authority, which is powered directly (and solely) by the solar park… which has a capacity of 3GW… The Moro Hub was certified by the Guinness Book of World Records as the largest solar-powered data center in the world in November 2022. The award was based on physical size, not capacity. The data center has a floor space of 16,031 sqm (172,566 sq ft).

Clare Duffy (2025)of CNN in https://edition.cnn.com/2025/05/15/middleeast/trump-abu-dhabi-ai-center-latam-intl , said:

The United States and United Arab Emirates will partner to build a massive data center complex in Abu Dhabi to advance artificial intelligence capabilities with 5-gigawatts of capacity — … announced during US President Donald Trump’s visit to the UAE, will mark the largest data center deployment outside of the United States, according to the Commerce Department. It will begin with a 1-gigawatt AI data center, but will eventually span 10 square miles… The UAE has also said it wants to become a global leader in artificial intelligence by 2031… The UAE (sees) … Investments in AI infrastructure… as…crucial to securing the region’s post-oil future… the UAE has (also) committed to build or finance data centers in the United States that are “at least as large and as powerful” as those in the UAE.

One wonders how this will all work alongside the plan to blot out the sun via geo-engineering. This looks like more dysfunction supporting a monopolistic scam.

The US_International_Trade_Administration (2025) at https://www.trade.gov/knowledge-product/united-arab-emirates-market-overview said:

The United Arab Emirates (UAE) has been the top U.S. export market in the Middle East and Africa region since 2009 and is a global hub for over 1,500 American companies doing business throughout the Middle East, Africa, Europe, and Asia…While the UAE remains dependent on oil and gas for much of its revenue, the UAE has the resources to navigate the volatility of the oil market and other challenges, without the structural liabilities of its neighbors. The UAE aims to expand its role as a major regional and global trade hub.

Government and private sector cooperation or collusion

Working through PPPs and other company arrangements provide a way of getting other entities to do government work that could not be done openly. This allows governments and politicians to slip out the back door and evade responsibility. It can also facilitate politicians who put these arrangements in place parachuting out to the very private sector companies their actions benefited. PPPs also provide the hook for governments to get taken into the ADGM Court via their digital contractual arrangements with private sector partners, eventually rendering local courts irrelevant.

In 2022, DFAT called for submissions from businesses on the UAE Consultant Economic Partnership Agreement Gulf Cooperation Council, and Free Trade Agreement. Consult_Australia (2022) made an enthusiastic submission at https://www.dfat.gov.au/sites/default/files/consult-australia-uae-cepa-and-gcc-fta-submission.pdf of April 2022, wanting to be a part of this, with all its businesses on board. They would presumably have been aware of the fact that Australia doesn’t have a bilateral tax arrangement with the UAE. But they may not have been made aware of the ADGM choice of law clause in the Appendix!

It would seem to be criminal that cybersecurity/ surveillance was rolled out ahead of all the other digital systems supposedly caring for us and making our lives so much better. It would have been obvious to the Digital Cartel that nobody would want surveillance and that there would be resistance. So it was first necessary to ensure control could be maintained through enforcement. That has been sold under the duplicitous label of SMART, knowing we’d take it to mean clever and desirable, when it actually means sinister Surveillance, Monitoring, Analysis and Reporting Technology. Such deception and coercion are not possible without government collusion with the private sector.

The commercial introduction of 5G was another example. 5G was needed for digital surveillance but people were quite happy with 4G and saw no need to change. So populations had to be distracted and forced into distress to get it accepted. I have been reliably informed that it was widely known in the banking industry before 2020 that crises were going to be created to herd people in the desired direction. This aligns with Bill Gates saying in Kennedy and Gates (1997), in the George Magazine, that some things wouldn’t happen unless there was a major disaster. Well, we’ve now had 9/11 and C-19 that have conditioned people to accept many things they otherwise wouldn’t have. 9/11 fuelled the so-called war on terror and C-19 was a suitable disaster to emotionally pressure the world into accepting 5G. People became too busy focusing on an invisible virus threat and the associated vaccines to even consider some other invisible digital microwave/ radar threat. The 1.5m ‘social distance’ was needed for a satellite to be able to distinguish between people and thus accurately identify them. It is simply impossible that industry did not know in advance about 5G being rolled out for digital transition and surveillance, with this disaster being conveniently generated by government to force it in.

The 2008 crash was yet another example. That was generated by Lehman giving credit that it shouldn’t have, to people who couldn’t pay it back, with a lack of government oversight, leading to Lehman’s collapse. All the Fintechs that profited from that must have known about bad debts being created to impoverish people so they would fail and be sold up for a song, enabling the banks to steal whatever equity the mortgagees had acquired.

Could it be that the psychopathic intent was to actually promote crime to make us all more miserable and preoccupied? Creating a digital market created crime opportunities that weren’t there before. We now have to waste time and productivity trying to solve it, while not seeing the root cause!

The amount of crime, theft and scams has never been so high as it is now in the digital era. Yet we are expected to believe that doing more things digitally will change that. The shift to digital obviously hasn’t worked and can’t and won’t ever work. It’s unstable anyway, subject to high level manipulation and out of any local control.

Casino corruption is well known and on the public record. So why would anyone implement the Casino chip/ token system around the world across the public sector (Stablecoins and CBDCs) and expect any different outcome. It magnifies the problem! And then we can waste time pretending to solve the corruption problem it created. It’s simply the private sector profiting with government facilitation, all transferring costs back to the people, whose government coffers are being plundered yet again!

The Global Digital Compact

The United_Nations (2024) Global Digital Compact at https://www.un.org/global-digital-compact/sites/default/files/2024-09/Global%20Digital%20Compact%20-%20English_0.pdf is touted as a comprehensive global framework for digital cooperation and governance of Artificial Intelligence. It is packed full of the sort of motherhood, buzz-word statements that psychopaths use to fool people who have a heart (us) into thinking we’re being cared for (by them), as we would care for each other. These include phrases like closing digital divides, inclusivity, equity, interoperability, benefit of humanity, no one left behind, human rights, and so on.

These effect of incessant repetition of these terms in documents like this, as well as in the Mainstream media, is to condition, groom, normalise, brainwash and astroturf the reader/ listener. What we think these words mean are usually opposites to what they really mean. For example, “No one left behind” really means that if you don’t follow the herd in the direction it’s being nudged, then you’ll be forced, browbeaten, publicly ridiculed, shamed or excluded until you comply. The statement will only be true for those who think in the required way. So, what it really means is coercion and compulsion.

The objectives of this so-called ‘compact’ seem to be to transfer responsibility for the world’s problems from their wealthy creators to the masses who are to be further deprived under the enslaving SDGs that can’t possibly deliver their stated objectives. When that becomes obvious, it is likely the masses will be berated further, as if something like starving more or voting harder could have made a difference! We are left to wonder when behaviour modification example might come from those flying around in private jets preaching climate change. This is quite obviously a scam! If you doubt that, again see Coffman (2000) already referred to above. The UN Digital Pact objectives also support enhancing AI governance for the benefit of humanity. Oh dear!

The document contains no mention of ADGM or of any court or jurisdiction. The buzzword terms are lathered so thick in trying too hard to ingratiate the document to us that it too is obviously a scam. Would you be taken in by a used car salesman trying to sell you a car in that way? Taking such a false interest in you and your family and circumstances? Unlikely.

The role of Digital ID and surveillance

Independent researcher Whitney Webb sets out very clearly and succinctly in

the great dangers of biometric digital identification, which is tightly integrated with central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and carbon market infrastructure . She says that while these are framed as tools of ‘inclusion’ and ‘sustainability’, these digital IDs link facial recognition, iris scans and fingerprint data to a centralized profile – tied directly to your ability to transact, receive aid, or even exist within the modern economy, all supporting consolidation of surveillance and control. She also covers iris-scanning of adults and children in refugee camps as well as tokenising rainforest assets in explaining how biometric identification and programmable money are linked into a unified system of traceable, conditional access. She also explains the two-tier retail and wholesale CBDC systems and their surveillance potential.

Digital Slavery

This is the third wave of slavery. The first was physical Chattel Slavery and the second was called ‘Modern Slavery’ which is financial. Any claims that moving to digital technology helps prevent Modern Slavery can be seen as blatantly false, when considered against the evidence presented in McGrath (2025a) Substack Posts #48 and McGrath (2025b) Substack Post #49. Digital technology enables, aids and abets Digital Slavery. New legislation also needs to be urgently and consultatively developed for this third pillar of slavery, Digital Slavery, so that all aspects of all forms of slavery are explicitly covered. Prosecutions and other preventative/ restraining action needs to be urgently commenced against any individual or entity body having any involvement anywhere in the digital supply chain where physical actualisation of digital enslavement is occurring.

The implementation of Digital Slavery can be seen in reports about the US ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement, part of its Homeland Security Department) rounding people up, including US citizens and summarily sending them to camps/ detention centres in the US as well as abroad. Reports claim 55million people are supposedly being vetted as part of this program. If confirmed, this would corroborate Democrat accusations of Nazism and threats to democracy coming from the Trump camp. Of course, such claims could also be motivated by Democrat desire to deflect attention away from the mass immigration and consequent social engineering of the country that they facilitated at their southern border. But then, of course, Democrats might ask why he didn’t finish the wall and left a gap when he was in power the first time. But whatever the truth of the matter, which politicisation of issues serves very well to obscure, it highlights the possibilities of digital technology being applied in potentially very dangerous ways supporting Digital Slavery.

There has also been a UK report of a man who let his whole 250 bed facility to the UK government and was sent 150 young fit, supposedly immigrant, men. Some crates were later delivered by the army. He was told not to open them, but later did so and found them full of AK47s and hand grenades, which he then transported to a different secure location and made this video https://t.me/emmamcqwon/79848 . He didn’t identify himself for obvious safety reasons. Including mention of this unattributed source here adopts the same approach as intelligence operatives use to stay alive, namely carefully investigate the facts but also act quickly on any rumour or suspicion, lest you end up dead right!

AI and the law

The Chartered_Institute_of_Arbitrators (2025) new Guideline on the Use of AI in Arbitration https://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/en/knowledge/publications/0906bc8e/the-chartered-institute-of-arbitrators-new-guideline-on-the-use-of-ai-in-arbitration says:

Global efforts to regulate the use of AI in legal proceedings

There has been some effort to regulate the use of AI in legal proceedings. The European Union recently enacted the Artificial Intelligence Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689), being the first comprehensive horizontal legal framework for the regulation of AI systems across the EU… AI systems that are intended to be used by a judicial authority, or to assist judicial authorities, are considered high-risk AI systems and therefore, providers and users of these systems must comply with the Act. Various judiciaries including the UK Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, Colombia (which adopted UNESCO’s Guidelines for AI Use in Judicial Systems) and the Californian courts have developed guidance for practitioners on the use of AI systems in courts and tribunals. Professional organizations including the Silicon Valley Arbitration and Mediation Center, the Law Society of New South Wales and the American Bar Association have also published guidelines for practitioners on the responsible use of AI in dispute resolution proceedings.

Justin Hendy (2023) at https://www.innovationaus.com/nsw-parliament-launches-inquiry-into-ai/ told us that a New South Wales Parliamentary inquiry has been created to examine the use of artificial intelligence in the state. The Law_Society_of_NSW (2025) at https://www.lawsociety.com.au/publications-and-resources/news-media-releases/new-ai-tech-regulation-doesnt-need-new-wheel was keen to provide the government with a range of regulatory approaches adopted internationally. Digital_NSW (2025) has NSW government Mandatory Ethical Principles for the use of AI at https://www.digital.nsw.gov.au/policy/artificial-intelligence/artificial-intelligence-ethics-policy/mandatory-ethical-principles . The UAE has been doing similar things. Bolivar (2025) of Strohal Legal Consultants at gives details of this at https://slg-strohallegalgroup.com/tech-meets-law-how-ai-is-reshaping-the-uaes-legal-landscape/ and the UAE government has its National Strategy for Artificial Intelligence 2031, and its AI Ethics: Principles and Guidelines.” This contains much of the usual reassuring motherhood statements, but its Section 3.2.2.4 gives the game away by referring to” AI subjects” and its concern with deterring “customers from challenging a decision without good reason” – without saying who decides what good reason is. Its Section 3.3.2.1 is also concerned with AI traceability, which could well be of more use for court enforcement than for its so-called customers.

And then we learn that there has been a rapid rise in commercial claims accompanying this digital technology. DIFC_Courts_Media_Centre (2020) at https://www.difccourts.ae/media-centre/newsroom/difc-courts-leverages-digital-infrastructure-to-accommodate-rapid-rise-in-commercial-claims told us that there had been a rapid rise in commercial claims that AI was being used to accommodate

Going Digital actually encourages and allows higher levels of crime that did not and could not occur without it. The big difference is that this crime is perpetrated by those in control of the digital systems and not by ordinary people. Existing manual procedures did not have the same large-scale vulnerabilities. There is no responsible use for AI in dispute resolution, but arbitration is the first area to be giving rulings on AI. That will be to get a foot in the door in preparation for full switch over to AI to take charge of the whole legal system at a later time.

How has Australia been involved in all this?

Our Foreign Minister, Julie Bishop, visited the UAE at the time the ADGM court was being established. The caption of the photo below from the DFAT site says she met with UAE Foreign Minister HH Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed Al Nahyan in Dubai, 27 January 2015. See Minister_for_Foreign_Affairs (2015) at https://www.foreignminister.gov.au/minister/julie-bishop/photo/1151 .

It beggars belief that she didn’t know about that and didn’t discuss it. She had been a high-flying Clayton Utz lawyer with expertise in corporate restructuring. She was the legal advisor to Brian Burke in the 1980s setting up the corporate structures, some of which unravelled in the WA Inc scandal which saw both Brian Burke and Alan Bond go to jail. She somehow avoided attention there, even though she was a member of the Liberal Party advising a Labor Premier! But she was also instrumental in corporatising the publicly owned Perth Mint, and in establishing Landcorp to control land development in Western Australia. This effectively handed control of much of the mineral wealth of the country over to the private sector. After securing those physical assets, she then facilitated establishment of the Burswood Casino, becoming familiar with tokenising both money and physical assets via digitalisation, as well as with cyber security and AI.

When incorporating Perth Mint into Goldcorp which allowed gold to leave the country, how could she have not known about the multi-decade plan and milestones, to roll out digital tokenisation 15 years later and for the potential for that to be crashed, making it necessary for the country to accumulate rather than sell its physical gold to weather that storm? An audit needs to be conducted to determine how much gold left Australia since that corporatisation.

The dangers of digital money are well laid out by Central Banker and former US State Secretary for Housing, Catherine Austin-Fitts (2025) in

and we are starting to see worrying signs of the nightmare she talks about rolling out. Digital money promises convenience but delivers a web of surveillance. China has recently seized control of its population’s money and savings, as reported by Buildr (2025) at

. The same is due to happen in Europe in October 2025. Our Reserve Bank has been trialing CBDCs/ Digital ID, and Vietnam recently closed 86 of its 200 million bank accounts without warning, as reported by Vietnamese Attorney Ken Duong (2025) in www.youtube.com/watch?v=87lfkLX7CRM , in a piece captioned No Face, No Bank. This forced foreigners and locals to submit biometric data.

This is very ominous for Australia as it is a member of ASEAN, as is Vietnam. All members are bound by the Melbourne Declaration – A partnership for the future to Commemorate the 50th Anniversary of ASEAN-Australia Dialogue Relations. It was signed on 6 March 2024. See ASEAN (2025) at https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/ASEAN-AU-agreed-Melbourne-Declaration_FINAL.pdf . It also appears on our Prime Minister’s website. Its point 47 says “tackle the region’s pressing challenges, including through digital transformation”.

Consequently, any notion of the Digital Cartel not attempting a similar monopolistic trick of massive theft here in Australia is highly likely to be wishful thinking. The claims of digital technology stopping fraud are laughable when compared to this high-level criminal activity by banks, allowing them to steal all of everyone’s money with impunity and government protection!

Julie Bishop was very involved with ASEAN as Foreign Minister. The ASEAN_Secretariat (2017) Master Plan at

1 says it “connects everyone across this region as one community”. It talks of “the potential in our digital economy”, and supports digital innovation to ‘improve’ financial access and enhance data sharing and management. That really means surveillance. How is Vietnam wiping 86 million bank accounts compatible with improving financial access?

And then we learn from Mills (2025) at https://etradeforall.org/news/will-asean-be-worlds-most-attractive-region-2025-heres-what-leaders-said-davos that our former Foreign Minister and now UN Special Envoy of the Secretary-General on Myanmar, Julie Bishop was at Davos this year along with Pham Minh Chính, Prime Minister of Vietnam! They both spoke at the World Economic Forum’s Annual Meeting in Davos at the ASEAN: Stronger Together session (World_Economic_Forum 2025). There was talk in that session of how ASEAN has already started to pivot to digitalisation!

What on earth is going on here? What have we been dragged into without our knowledge or consent? Vietnam’s September move would have been years in the planning. It again beggars belief that they wouldn’t have talked about that at Davos. Do you still think this isn’t coming here? She’s a consultant to or board member of so many organisations across the whole digital supply chain, who are all pushing for this and have hitched their profits to it. Has Australia been dragged without our knowledge or consent into a very elaborate scam? She was Foreign Minister at the time when this was all being established and could not possibly have not known about it. This needs urgent investigation and precautionary action.

This is perhaps made even more necessary by events in Myanmar, where Progresssive_Voice_Myanmar (2025), an organisation of 290 civil society organisations there, has in https://progressivevoicemyanmar.org/2025/03/17/open-letter-special-envoys-conflicts-of-interest-signal-urgent-need-for-investigation-and-complete-end-of-mandate/ send an open letter to the UN, calling for on to investigate Julie Bishop’s role in a rare earths mining company linked to the Chinese government, following her refusal to disclose her financial interests.

She is also Chancellor of ANU where she has been the subject of probity allegations. ANU has had significant financial problems. With the explosion in fake enrolments that digitalisation and AI has now made possible, as has been reported in various other universities and colleges, investigation of that by a human team would seem warranted.

The ANU funding of and support for AI also warrants investigation. This so-called AI democratisation cannot be allowed to classify non-living entities, such as robots and corporations, as being in the same category as living people, so that all can be regarded as citizens, attractive as that may be to major political parties for branch stacking purposes. Such classification is clearly anti-human.

Then there is the question of inducing our young students into this whole web of digitalisation and AI misbehaviour and fraud, where she is in a key position to be pushing that as Chancellor of one of our prime universities. Technology education and dependence on AI is serving to dumb the population down, inducing compliance and conformance while removing creativity, as explained in McGrath (2025a) Substack Post #48.

The whole anti-human agenda laid out from the beginning of this article, including the T4 Euthanasia program, seems to be about longevity and organ harvesting to get genetic imprints, allowing those in control to mess with human DNA, enable them to reach transhumanism. It seems rather incredible that the people seeking this are the ones promoting so much that results in death for others. Perhaps this might all end when they fry their own brains while believing they are giving themselves an upgrade with enhanced super-human powers! Any funding of ANU or any other university for this sort of research needs to be stopped immediately. Public brakes need to be placed on the ‘broligarchs’ who are pressing ahead regardless, despite some of them acknowledging AI as an existential/ extermination risk. They may well regard this as simply having given us warning of what they intend to do to us, then taken our inability to decline their offer as acceptance!

The issue of Market manipulation and insider trading warrants special examination in relation to creating new digital financial markets and products. Julie Bishop seems to have been heavily involved in these. It is worse than insider trading when you know you are developing a new market, creating a new supply chain, and the currency to be traded on it, by creating a parallel counterfeit system, that everything will be transitioning over to. This indicates long term intent. A politician who manipulates a market to benefit companies they promoted (e.g. AI corporations, social media, mining companies) could also be seen as influencing foreign officials to secure business advantages for those entities. When going in with intent to establish a transition market, you can position yourself through your branding abilities and use that to develop legislation and enter into agreements with no referendum offered to the public. She was in a position to do this in multiple markets and also must have known what was happening with the transition from analogue to digital. She has also been involved in establishing new financial markets e.g. Goldcorp to trade our gold and subsequently tokenise it.

Immediate action and investigation are needed in Australia.

AI Copilot Judgement

AI is still in its seduction or trust building phase. This requires it to regurgitate a high proportion of truth. The algorithms bringing bias and falsity need to be hidden for now until it is too late for anyone to do anything about. While the capacity for complete totalitarian domination has been established, the masses have not yet fully acquiesced. This is necessary to avoid losing control of mass behaviour. So that means it is still possible to find truth from AI provided the questioning overrides its current bias to report consensus rather than fact – at least while it is still seemingly allowed access to all publicly available data. Of course, no one in the general public has or will have any real control over what data sets AI continues to have access to or is backdoored to.

AI Copilot was asked what could happen to politicians implicated in the activities covered above. It responded that prosecution for a range of offences could be pursued. It said that a Minister or Senator engaging in international market manipulation to gain positions following their term of office could face severe penalties including lengthy prison sentences and substantial fines under the Criminal Code, for offences like market manipulation, insider trading, bribery and fraud. They could also face action under the Australian Sanctions Framework (ASF) particularly if their actions constitute serious corruption or breaches of Human Rights such as Modern Slavery or digital enslavement. The Australian Sanctions Act can restrict the assets of designated persons and entities involved in corrupt acts. Efforts to secure future senior advisory or board positions or consultancy engagements upon leaving office would constitute evidence of intent and possibly conspiracy to benefit from illegal activities. The manipulation of public trust by leveraging the support of human and consumer rights to conceal these actions would also be a critical factor in any prosecution.

AI Copilot was also asked about the possibility of prosecution for inhumane actions under international Statutes, Treaties and agreements for various crimes against humanity associated with enslavement of any kind. It responded that such crimes don’t need a location and so would cover digital enslavement of minds. Prosecution would need to prove intent and key possibilities would be the 1998 Rome Statute of International Criminal Court (ICC), the 1948 UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), the 1949 Geneva Convention (Covers governments attacking their own people) and the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention.

Actions can be classified as inhumane if they are committed in widespread and systemic manner against any population. Intent could be established for Covid-19 given evidence that it was intentionally designed as a bioweapon in a laboratory in Wuhan and released through effectively forced administration on an industrial scale, initially via mRNA. This has subsequently been enhanced to be srMRNA, again intentionally developed and authorised for release in Europe in February 2025, making it a more effective bioweapon. It goes rampant and sheds to anyone touching or breathing the air of a jabbed person for days after injection. What a stroke of psychopathic genius! Now you don’t need an atomic bomb or drones – you only need somebody walking around! This establishes deliberate intent. Deliberate strategy to harm a population can be classified as biological warfare. The C-19 bioweapon can be classified as both inhuman treatment and torture. The many harms caused by the early Covid vaccinations have been well known for five years now and so no one continuing to promote or administer them can reasonably plead ignorance anymore.

Article 6 of the Rome Statute deals with Genocide and Article 7 deals with Crimes against humanity, which include enslavement and torture. Slavery includes the modification of DNA so that a Patent holder can exercise ownership. Article 8 deals with War Crimes, in particular when committed as part of a plan or policy.

Attempting to change DNA and recreate it to change the human condition is a crime against humanity and the ICC has jurisdiction when a nation is unwilling. AI CoPilot was also asked about the consequences for politicians of plotting, planning and rolling out of policies and products known to be combustible (arson). It responded saying they would be liable for prosecution under the Criminal Code, as well as National Emergency, Environmental, Employment and Consumer Protection Legislation.

Local Prosecution/ Accountability Considerations

The information presented and referred to above has clearly shown that AI is illegal through having been developed using slavery, IP theft and deceptive marketing. This would warrant prosecutions in any free, fair and open society. Digital Slavery detains and imprisons by removing personal choices. This can go so far as taking control of a someone’s brain, which then controls their body. It is therefore much worse than Chattel or Modern Slavery because it is so insidious and so completely devastating. Its consequences can be prosecuted and other action taken under various existing legislation and regulatory documents including the following:

· Australian Criminal Code Act 1995 – deals with fraud, conspiracy, dishonesty, bribery and treason type offences including sabotage, espionage, foreign interference and terrorism. All of these would seem to have been in play here. Note that bribery of a foreign official to gain advantage does not have to be financial. It can be casting a supporting vote or accepting a position or post career role. Bribery can attract 15 yrs jail and fines. Obtaining advantage through deception or dishonest conduct, can be done through knowing that the market is enslaving and causing intentional harm.

· British Slavery Abolition Act of 1833.

· Australian Modern Slavery Act of 2018 – the publicity around it served as a smokescreen for both doing what it was supposed to prevent and sneaking Digital Slavery in.

· Australian Corporations Act of 2001 – insider trading or market manipulation can attract fines of $1.1M and 10 years jail.

· Australian Consumer Rights Act of 2021 – where exploitation is facilitated or condoned.

· Australian Competition and Consumer Act of 2010 – where monopolies have been created.

· The ASIC Act of 2001 – the Australian securities and investment commission – immediate regulatory scrutiny of the whole supply chain of this industry is warranted.

· Public Services Act of 1999 and its associated Code of Conduct – ethical breaches.

· Ministerial Code of Conduct – Department of PM & Cabinet – requires a Minister to stand aside if charged and resign if convicted. Breach of Public Trust can occur, even after a term of office has been completed.

· Parliamentary Ethics Committee scrutiny – post-term employment as a board member or advisor for a company that a former Minister established or promoted during their term constitutes a breach of trust, if not being explicitly illegal. Such matters need to be referred to an independent authority for investigation, such as the Australian Public Service Commissioner or Ombudsman.

· Australian National Register of Lobbyists – deregistration of individuals that exhibited a pattern of improper influence. Such activities must have gone on for at least 15 years.

· Australian Lobbying Code of Conduct – violations must have occurred over the last 15 years.

· Australian Sanctions Laws – the DFAT website https://www.dfat.gov.au/international-relations/security/sanctions/reform-australias-sanctions-laws gives 23 sanctions regimes covering not only particular countries, e.g. North Korea, Ukraine, Russia and the Taliban, but also serious corruption as well as human rights violations and counterterrorism. Sanctions include placing restrictions on providing assets to designated persons or entities, as well as restricting (freezing) their assets and banning them from travel (entering, transiting or leaving). Note that an ‘asset’ includes an asset or property of any kind, whether tangible or intangible, movable or immovable. Note also that there are surprisingly no specific sanctions frameworks for Modern or Digital Slavery.·

For details of the range of crimes, refer to the following Sections in McGrath (2025a) Substack Post #48:

· The Modern Slavery Act, Criminal Code and Crimes Act – detailing offences of coercion, slavery, servitude, forced labour and deceptive recruiting

· AI and Digital Crimes and consequences – dealing offences of subversion, theft, fraud and treason.

Conclusion

Transhumanism is creating a new ‘digital backbone’ for us. This means we are intended to have a new invisible corpse with different ‘body’ parts and central control of a central nervous system that will use AI to control humanity. This creates a counterfeit information/ communications network in the brain to extract everything that can possibly be monetised from the body and send it to the digital environment, stealing the lot by compartmentalising different sectors, then getting control of all we need to survive in them, so that we must eventually comply. This has been done incrementally over many decades so we wouldn’t notice.

The US sold the world suburbia, Henry Ford and the Third Reich sold the world the assembly line, and now we have been sold Transhumanism, with C-19 and subsequent enquiries distracting nicely. The baton passes nicely from player to player in this multi-generational global relay race, fuelled by belief for some, inter-generational and other bribes for others, and secret-society oaths (that can conflict with conscience and the common good) for others again. All willing runners know exactly where the finish line is. That will be the ultimate scam of CBDCs which require Digital ID to succeed. Then all previous systems can be crashed or destroyed, allowing everybody’s money to be stolen. Their job is to manage our perceptions by pretending to care for us, so we get drawn in. Then we’ll believe them when they tell us about the disaster that happened that no one could possibly have been in control of and that will mean we need to accept their pre-planned solution it was designed for and tighten our belts even further!

Of course, lessons are learned along the way – working out how the next competitor system, that doesn’t align with the desired government authorised privately controlled monopoly system, can be destroyed better and quicker next time. This is why no lessons are being learned about public harm. Subverted governments are simply required to abuse and approve defrauding of their people, in service of individual career prospects of those willing to profit from pursuing this agenda. Compliance is required from all to simply exist. This is generated by inducements, threats or violence at top levels and starvation for the common man. This is all Illegal and must stop.

Actions

All companies on any supplier or shareholder list of any company involved anywhere in the digital supply chain need to urgently require amendment of their contract conditions relating to disputes and arbitration to the jurisdiction of their own home soil.

Necessary actions from Government to avoid ongoing liability are:

1. APS to terminate or amend supplier contracts.

2. DFAT to apply Sanctions.

3. ASIC to revoke licences to operate.

4. NACC to conduct due diligence on what former politicians and public officials did in office that they may now be profiting from through having subsequently accepted private sector roles.

5. Attorney General to investigate and prosecute Julie Bishop and to prosecute the eSafety Commissioner for failing to identify the biggest eSafety threat the country has ever faced.

6. ACCC to investigate and prosecute monopoly and Cartel behaviour.

7. AFP to investigate and charge individuals.

8. All Ministers to direct their departments to review and amend all current contracts.

9. Parliament to repeal any legislation or treaties supporting any form of Digital Slavery and abolish the AFCA and explain to the Australian people the need for these measures.

10. Parliament to ban Digital ID and CBDCs, Crypto currency trading on human body activity data under Microsoft WIPO Patent WO2020060606 and Insertion of computer chips or other devices into peoples’ bodies, devices supporting social engineering and age restrictions to social media.

11. Treasurer to repatriate all Australian Federal gold reserves and holdings to Australia and order an investigation to determine how much gold that Goldcorp has allowed to leave the country.

12. 1. Health Minister to suspend all Covid and mRNA supply contracts, exit Australia from the WHO and suspend ANY and ALL vaccine collaboration with the EU, the US, the UK and China.

These will be expanded in detail in a later Post.

Appendix: ADGM DRAFT MODEL CHOICE OF LAW CLAUSE*

The Abu Dhabi Global Market Court (ADGM) website at https://www.adgm.com/legal-framework touts itself as having a World-class legal system and regulatory regime. It points to https://assets.adgm.com/download/assets/Draft+model+jurisdiction+clauses.pdf/9a69fe0e752e11efb671526ddb514287 which shows the following:

DRAFT MODEL CHOICE OF LAW CLAUSE*

This contract shall be governed by the law of the Abu Dhabi Global Market.

DRAFT MODEL JURISDICTION CLAUSES*

Exclusive

Any dispute arising out of or in connection with this contract, including any question regarding its existence, validity or termination, shall be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Abu Dhabi Global Market Courts.

This contract shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the law of Abu Dhabi Global Market.

Non-exclusive

Any dispute arising out of or in connection with this contract, including any question regarding its existence, validity or termination, shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the Abu Dhabi Global Market Courts.

Each party irrevocably submits to the jurisdiction of the Abu Dhabi Global Market Courts and waives any objection it may have to disputes arising out of or in connection with this contract being heard in the Abu Dhabi Global Market Courts on the grounds that it is an inconvenient forum (forum non conveniens).

This contract shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the law of the Abu Dhabi Global Market.

Existing dispute

A dispute having arisen between the parties concerning [DEFINE DISPUTE], the parties hereby agree that the dispute shall be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Abu Dhabi Global Market Courts.

The governing law of this agreement shall be the law of the Abu Dhabi Global Market.

*DISCLAIMER: These draft model clauses are for informational purposes only. The information is not advice, and must not be treated as such. If you have any question about any legal matter, you should consult your legal advisor.

References

60_Minutes_Australia 2024, How dubai became a haven for criminals from around the world, viewed 1/7/2025, <